|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sounds like something Andrew would be interested in ...
"
I've been pondering a type that's so mind-bogglingly weird that I can no
longer think about it without frying my neurons. So instead I'll just
dump the contents of my brain here so you can fry your neurons too.
"
http://sigfpe.blogspot.com/2008/01/type-that-should-not-be.html
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Normal programmers concern themselves with building the best algorithm
to solve a problem, or finding the most maintainable way to structure a
program. Haskell programmers concern themselves with Russell's paradox
and the nature of set theory.
Hmm. There's something deep, right there...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Hmm. There's something deep, right there...
Yes, but notice something: You don't know who Stallman is, but you do
know who Russell is. ;-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Hmm. There's something deep, right there...
>
> Yes, but notice something: You don't know who Stallman is, but you do
> know who Russell is. ;-)
Um... actually I have no idea who Russell is, or what his paradox is.
But I presume it's something to do with set theory, so...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Um... actually I have no idea who Russell is, or what his paradox is.
> But I presume it's something to do with set theory, so...
nothing like being ignorant and enjoying every bit of it! :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> nothing like being ignorant and enjoying every bit of it! :P
Do you know who the lead singer of Space is?
Do you care?
No, I thought not. :-P
It is impossible to know everything. Some people simply find some facts
more interesting than others. (E.g., most of the population couldn't
give a fig about the difference between a quicksort and a merge sort,
yet people here sometimes run elaborate benchmarks to compare them.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:19:06 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>
>Yes, but notice something: You don't know who Stallman is, but you do
>know who Russell is. ;-)
Bertrand Russell ?
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Sounds like something Andrew would be interested in ...
>
> "
> I've been pondering a type that's so mind-bogglingly weird that I can no
> longer think about it without frying my neurons. So instead I'll just
> dump the contents of my brain here so you can fry your neurons too.
> "
>
> http://sigfpe.blogspot.com/2008/01/type-that-should-not-be.html
It is probably to my gain that I understood none of that.
After all you said it all: it should not be. And it doesn't exist for me.
Nemesis wrote:
>nothing like being ignorant and enjoying every bit of it! :P
Makes me think of Maxwell. Probably everyone knows of him.
A case where you are unknowingly NOT enjoying being ignorant.
You may recall scalar magnitude. 2 waves traveling in opposite direction cancel.
0 Amplitude. 0 Frequency. I recall little else on that concept, except that we
were left with some erroneous concept that the 2 waves were cancelled and their
power was not discussed.
Full disclosure of his theory was removed from academia because it was thought
to be too powerful. Maybe you were left wondering. It is the important things
we need to know, it is not?
Generally some people are right or left brained people. That is, the side you
What would happen if the hemispheres of your brain were operating on the same
freq?
Would you fall over dead? Or be zombified because you now had 0 Amplitude and 0
Frequency in your head? And what would sync these 2 cranial hemispheres electro
magnetically? What would be the result? I believe Maxwell had an answer to the
last question that you were not allowed to know.
Anyone?
Else this dies here.
aQ
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > nothing like being ignorant and enjoying every bit of it! :P
>
> Do you know who the lead singer of Space is?
>
> Do you care?
>
> No, I thought not. :-P
>
> It is impossible to know everything.
you know, if you think Bertrand Russel's contribution to mankind is the same as
some underground band, you are in need of some serious perspective...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Generally some people are right or left brained people. That is, the side you
>
> What would happen if the hemispheres of your brain were operating on the same
> freq?
I'd be a millionaire... ;)
Maxwell... cool guy. We should name some raytracer with his name for his
contributions in optics... oh, never mind!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |