POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : re: Jim Charter's 2007 Server Time
15 Oct 2026 00:16:42 EDT (-0400)
  re: Jim Charter's 2007 (Message 1 to 21 of 21)  
From: Shay
Subject: re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 18 Jan 2008 15:33:25
Message: <47910d15$1@news.povray.org>
> As recently as a week ago I had to dig down. I was scheduled to do
 > a brace of three, totally new, 8-hour, geography modules. I had
 > zero prep time.  For eighteen days previous I'd not had a single
 > day off, (I was either driving or teaching,) during which I could
 > develop new material.  So overnight, for each of the three nights,
 > I memorized how to draw maps of first Brooklyn, then Queens, then
 > the Bronx, along with their several dozen streets, parks, and
 > neighbourhoods, then reproduced them the following day,
 > hand-drawn, standing at the chalk-board.  The trick is to be able
 > to lay in the features with smooth-drawn lines, and without
 > erasures. Students are usually exposed to several instructors and
 > are quick to make comparisons, are critical, and not shy about
 > verbalizing their thoughts.  Whatever you may or may not think
 > about all this, it was a personal benchmark for me that puts me
 > significantly beyond what I would have been capable of the
 > previous year.

Impressive and interesting. I have spent some time recently 
contemplating burnouts (a surprising percentage of the homeless 
population [One interesting case was a programmer who had a 
stress-induced heart-attack at 28yo]) and the metal-head culture of 
which 9 out of 10 of the few intelligent people I meet in the oilfield 
are a part. The link between them and you is the means by and degree to 
which you seem to be adapting to your current circumstances. It appears 
you are finding your niche in your new profession, but are doing so not 
by evolving (in fact, refusing to evolve) but by making only small 
adaptations to the skills you developed while engaged in other pursuits. 
I think there is a sizeable, hidden world of efficacious individuals who 
insist on defining achievement and performance in terms others would not 
understand.

 > Have not published much on the ng's but through the early to
 > middle of the year I enjoyed an extended collaboration, off-ng,
 > with another POV artist.  It gave me a certain stick-to-it-ness,
 > over an extended period, which had been lacking for a long time.

Will the results of this collaboration be "published"?

 > Fitness:
 > Bad scene, but again, the mental health is improving so that might
 > lead to improvements down the road.

The two go hand in hand, IMO. Despite the stress, danger, and long 
hours, I have never met a depressed roughneck. Almost every driller (a 
non-physical job) I have met has been depressed. I believe there's 
medicine in physical activity.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 18 Jan 2008 17:40:41
Message: <2la2p3tmdsnikhc3k1g9vqqappo20kvdh2@4ax.com>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:28:22 -0500, Shay <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote:

>
>The two go hand in hand, IMO. Despite the stress, danger, and long 
>hours, I have never met a depressed roughneck. Almost every driller (a 
>non-physical job) I have met has been depressed. I believe there's 
>medicine in physical activity.

Hi Shay,
How many roughnecks can count to ten on their fingers? :)

How can you say that the driller's or even the pusher's job is not physical?
When compared to onshore jobs. Seriously, unless you are on a modern rig with
push button controls for the iron roughneck the driller's job involved a lot of
strain and repetitive movement. But then I may be very out of date. I've met
drillers who were not depressed only mad and very often bad.
I think that it is easier to be mentally fit when you are physically fit. Since
I stopped working on the tools I've found that it is getting easier to slip into
bad habits.

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 18 Jan 2008 18:29:59
Message: <47913677$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

> Hi Shay,
> How many roughnecks can count to ten on their fingers? :)

So that's how drillers count? :)


> 
> How can you say that the driller's or even the pusher's job is not physical?

Perhaps it is not AS physical.


> When compared to onshore jobs. Seriously, unless you are on a modern rig with
> push button controls for the iron roughneck the driller's job involved a lot of
> strain and repetitive movement. But then I may be very out of date. I've met
> drillers who were not depressed only mad and very often bad.

Shay probably over-generalized there.


> I think that it is easier to be mentally fit when you are physically fit. Since
> I stopped working on the tools I've found that it is getting easier to slip into
> bad habits.

I guess we all agree on that. Though its been so long since I've been 
physically fit I can't really remember anymore.  I really have to get 
serious though.  Cab driving is so bad for one's fitness that it doesn't 
take much to push things over the edge.  Some anxiety, a little bingeing 
and it's a big mess.

-jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 18 Jan 2008 18:56:55
Message: <cge2p3p4emdmtf893or05mj9mo5e339p58@4ax.com>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:29:47 -0500, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Hi Shay,
>> How many roughnecks can count to ten on their fingers? :)
>
>So that's how drillers count? :)
>

There is the old roughneck joke:
A roughneck walked into a bar and held up his hand with all his fingers spread
and said. "Two pints, barman."

>
>> 
>> How can you say that the driller's or even the pusher's job is not physical?
>
>Perhaps it is not AS physical.
>

I was joshing, there is no comparison. A roughneck's job is probably one of the
most dangerous and physically demanding there is. I'm just trying to regain the
camaraderie I lost when I left the tools. <sad git>


>> When compared to onshore jobs. Seriously, unless you are on a modern rig with
>> push button controls for the iron roughneck the driller's job involved a lot of
>> strain and repetitive movement. But then I may be very out of date. I've met
>> drillers who were not depressed only mad and very often bad.
>
>Shay probably over-generalized there.
>

Nah! It's a job thing. Park your brains at the door when you get promoted :)

>
>> I think that it is easier to be mentally fit when you are physically fit. Since
>> I stopped working on the tools I've found that it is getting easier to slip into
>> bad habits.
>
>I guess we all agree on that. Though its been so long since I've been 
>physically fit I can't really remember anymore.  I really have to get 
>serious though.  Cab driving is so bad for one's fitness that it doesn't 
>take much to push things over the edge.  Some anxiety, a little bingeing 
>and it's a big mess.
>
I sympathise Jim. I've b*ggered my body working offshore and can't exercise or
I'll make it worse. So I've had to limit my food intake to stop getting fat as I
get depressed (not clinically). My weight see saws in a 2 or 3 year cycle.
Fortunately my appetite goes on its own accord when I reach about 13 stones
(~185 lbs). So it is not too hard to loose weight, so far :)

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 18 Jan 2008 20:06:54
Message: <47914d2e$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:

> Impressive 

thanks

and interesting.

it is actually, I mean in a different discussion from the points you 
make in your following, their is the whole discussion of what comprises 
a 'knowledge' of geography, how to teach it, how to test it. It cuts to 
some fundamental issues, abstract versus tangible knowledge, how memory 
works, how we understand and recall geographical relationships. (I am 
consciously avoiding the word 'spatial' here.)  For instance if you look 
into techniques for memorizing lists of information, a common one is to 
associate the information with a map or journey of some sort.  But that 
is precisely what I am trying to GET people to remember.

I have spent some time recently
> contemplating burnouts (a surprising percentage of the homeless 
> population [One interesting case was a programmer who had a 
> stress-induced heart-attack at 28yo]) and the metal-head culture of 
> which 9 out of 10 of the few intelligent people I meet in the oilfield 
> are a part. The link between them and you is the means by and degree to 
> which you seem to be adapting to your current circumstances. 
Okay

It appears
> you are finding your niche in your new profession, but are doing so not 
> by evolving
Okay

  (in fact, refusing to evolve)
a little puzzled here, refusing?  I have little sense of resisting or 
'putting on the brakes'.  I mean I refused to even try to go back to my 
old life, but I don't see that as refusing to evolve, rather there is a 
way in which I actually did lay myself open to evolving, my values at 
least, by just kind of drifting rather than taking any purposeful 
direction, and I did that, at obvious risk to financial security of any 
sort, never mind intangibles like 'status.'  But it is questionable as 
to how 'conscious' that decision actually was.

Ohhh, maybe you mean when I dropped the blog?  Ohhh...yes, see later...

but by making only small
> adaptations to the skills you developed while engaged in other pursuits.
I agree, for instance cab driving might have been/or still be an 
opportunity to invest in a business for myself, learn about owning a 
car, even a medallion, the intricacies of debt etc., but I have not 
pushed that far. But is reusing previously acquired skills in a new 
context the only common denominator you've observed?  There must be more 
to what you are driving at here.

> I think there is a sizeable, hidden world of efficacious individuals who 
> insist on defining achievement and performance in terms others would not 
> understand.

Obviously a huge and difficult topic.  In this sense, of how acheivement 
is defined I may have allowed some tiny 'evolution' for myself.  But 
still, on one hand there's the cliche that this still can be nothing 
more than a rationale for failure, and on the other hand, I have perhaps 
resisted development towards less material acheivements.  Yes now I 
think I understand what you were driving at earlier.  Just wondering how 
it is something in common with 'burnouts'  I would be interested if you 
could develop that point further.



> Will the results of this collaboration be "published"?
> 

Not sure.  At very least I should update my web site.  Right now map 
drawings of New York geography has my attention to the point of obsession.

>  > Fitness:
>  > Bad scene, but again, the mental health is improving so that might
>  > lead to improvements down the road.
> 
> The two go hand in hand, IMO. Despite the stress, danger, and long 
> hours, I have never met a depressed roughneck. Almost every driller (a 
> non-physical job) I have met has been depressed. I believe there's 
> medicine in physical activity.


I believe so too.  Humans do have many 'dimensions' for development 
though.

A cute aside...  My daughter,  who has more drive as a young adolescent, 
than her father ever had,... after her struggles as a highschool 
freshman,... is gaining much better social 'traction' in her sophomore 
year. Significant in this development was her joining the female varsity 
softball team.  This lead to her swift adoption by the school's sports 
sub-culture, and a place on the junior varsity basketball team. 
Basketball is a sport she has never played.  Traditionally we're all 
about ice hockey in the Charter family, a sport which she still plays as 
one of two females in the league.  But basketball is the new enthusiasm, 
a development I am loving; still, I know nothing about the game.  So 
there I am on a Saturday morning up at the HS gym, an environment in 
which I feel totally alien, being instructed in the  operation of the 
'shot clock', by the young female referees who are less than half my 
age.  All new to me,...but fun.


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 19 Jan 2008 09:52:55
Message: <47920ec7$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:

 > Shay wrote:
 >> It appears you are finding your niche in your new profession, but are
 >> doing so not by evolving (in fact, refusing to evolve) but by making
 >> only small adaptations to the skills you developed while engaged in
 >> other pursuits.

 > I agree, for instance cab driving might have been/or still be an
 > opportunity to invest in a business for myself, learn about owning
 > a car, even a medallion, the intricacies of debt etc., but I have
 > not pushed that far. But is reusing previously acquired skills in
 > a new context the only common denominator you've observed?  There
 > must be more to what you are driving at here.

 > Obviously a huge and difficult topic.  In this sense, of how
 > acheivement is defined I may have allowed some tiny 'evolution'
 > for myself.  But still, on one hand there's the cliche that this
 > still can be nothing more than a rationale for failure, and on the
 > other hand, I have perhaps resisted development towards less
 > material acheivements.  Yes now I think I understand what you were
 > driving at earlier.  Just wondering how it is something in common
 > with 'burnouts'  I would be interested if you could develop that
 > point further.

Yes, you understand perfectly.

Skill recycling isn't a common denominator, just a sign that a person is 
"cherry-picking" the areas of his occupation where he wants to place his 
energy rather than diving wholly into "succeeding" at that profession. 
The common denominator is a lack of extroversion or fear (of financial 
ruin) or any other trait that makes a given apple on a stick look as 
appealing to one person as it does to another.

As to this "refusal's" being a rational for failure, I suppose it is in 
some instances and not in others. Moving over to my clearest point of 
reference - my self:

In High School, others had even me believing that I was an underachiever 
because my grades were poor. I laugh at that now. Would an underachiever 
run 24 miles a week? Work late nights after school? Train countless 
hours on home-made equipment?

I wasn't and am not currently underachieving. What I was/am doing is 
focusing my energy into areas that provide little or no chance for 
"success." I didn't have the genetics or want to become even a 
small-town track-and-field competitor; my after-school job was 
satisfying but offered no resume-enhancement; and despite my many years 
of working out, you'd never know I was into fitness at all unless you 
saw a blood test. What I could have done is get a doctorate in 
Electrical Engineering as my brother is doing, but working in an office 
seemed too much like going to school, and I *refused* to spend my life 
doing anything that felt as terrible as going to school. I have what 
some others consider a lopsided view of the costs versus rewards of that 
type of occupation - and of my current occupation.

Someone who spends his night watching TV and grumbles that he's too good 
to cheat to get ahead like the other weasels have done? Yeah, that guy 
is rationalizing failure.

Burnouts run away from whatever it was that burned them up, but only run 
so far, because they still find a lot of appeal in whatever rewards drew 
them to that occupation in the first place. The homeless programmer who 
had the heart attack at 28 introduced himself as "Windows" and still 
dressed as best he could manage as a programmer. He couldn't survive 
being a programmer occupationally but got what he needed by playing the 
roll of "computer guy" socially.

 >> I believe there's medicine in physical activity.

 > I believe so too.  Humans do have many 'dimensions' for
 > development though.

Many, but I truly believe that brain (not mental) fitness is the 
foundation under all other dimensions of development. I believe that the 
brain is like the heart or any other organ in that it will be sick if 
not given the proper physical environment. I can't see how a person can 
put potato chips into his brain and expect that brain to produce a 
healthy mind.

 > A cute aside...  My daughter,  who has more drive as a young
 > adolescent, than her father ever had,... after her struggles as a
 > highschool freshman,... is gaining much better social 'traction'
 > in her sophomore year.

Excellent. I need to find some pretext to have a long talk with my 
niece(13yo) about bad social habits. My niece is smart enough not to 
smoke crack or get pregnant just because her friends are doing it, but I 
don't think she grasps how carefully she needs to guard herself against 
less obviously destructive (but more contagious) habits and attitudes 
that can be picked up from friends. The pretext is necessary because her 
mother has fallen victim to this herself and wouldn't want me lecturing 
her child on the dangers of hanging out with losers.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 19 Jan 2008 10:09:03
Message: <4792128f$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

 > Nah! It's a job thing. Park your brains at the door when you get
 > promoted :)

Or "Park your brains when you *accept* a promotion." A driller in my 
company makes $90k a year. Not bad considering how poorly many of them 
read and write, but the job is a miserable one: sit on a stool and watch 
a gauge - btw, f*** up and people die. A bit more to it than that, of 
course, but no way to spend a life! No wonder they're so bitchy.

 > I sympathise Jim. I've b*ggered my body working offshore and can't
 > exercise or I'll make it worse.

Come on, you don't have to pump iron, buy a bicycle.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 19 Jan 2008 10:50:58
Message: <r964p318nub35p68mf5227fd8bpdsnj5ce@4ax.com>
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:03:53 -0500, Shay <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
> > Nah! It's a job thing. Park your brains at the door when you get
> > promoted :)
>
>Or "Park your brains when you *accept* a promotion." 

LOL - true

>A driller in my 
>company makes $90k a year. Not bad considering how poorly many of them 
>read and write, but the job is a miserable one: sit on a stool and watch 
>a gauge - btw, f*** up and people die. A bit more to it than that, of 
>course, but no way to spend a life! No wonder they're so bitchy.

In my day and in the UK sector. The driller actually worked a bit. But if that
mud pressure changed fast then you'd better hope the BOP works :)
I never had to work under the drilling crew because I was part of the barge crew
reporting to the OIM. So I would have a slightly different viewpoint.


> > I sympathise Jim. I've b*ggered my body working offshore and can't
> > exercise or I'll make it worse.
>
>Come on, you don't have to pump iron, buy a bicycle.

I've thought about that but:
1.	I live in the centre of London and the traffic scares be silly.
2.	My hips are on the verge of giving out. If I walk for more than about 3
miles or an hour. I have to take pain killers.
Swimming might be better if I hadn't pulled a muscle in my arm that hasn't
healed properly. Or if I didn't find it boring and wet.
It is a concern :(
But then I'm pushing 60 and can wear my t-shirt tucked in to my breeks so I
shouldn't complain too much. 

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Galvin
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 20 Jan 2008 06:23:00
Message: <47932f14$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> 
> Excellent. I need to find some pretext to have a long talk with my 
> niece(13yo) about bad social habits. 

YMMV but I found repeated short conversations more effective at that age.


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 20 Jan 2008 10:32:30
Message: <4793698e@news.povray.org>
Tom Galvin wrote:
 > Shay wrote:
 >>
 >> Excellent. I need to find some pretext to have a long talk with
 >> my niece(13yo) about bad social habits.
 >
 > YMMV but I found repeated short conversations more effective at
 > that age.

Don't know many teenagers, but I think it depends on one's relationship 
with the kid. In a way, we're fairly close. I knew her parents before 
she was born and rented a room from them when my niece was a baby. She 
was calling me "Uncle Shay" before I had even met her aunt. On the other 
hand, I'm not an uncle to her like my uncles were to me.[1] My uncles 
had nearly as much authority over me as my parents. They could pull off 
preaching to me.

Back to the first hand, she does recognize that I am one of the few 
adults around her who acts like an adult (the rest [the exact type I 
would warn her to avoid] are needy and try to be her buddy). Teens are 
going to f*** up in life as part of their learning process, preaching or 
no. I feel the only thing within my "power" to do is give her a "heads 
up" and hope that helps her figure it out for herself a minute earlier. 
If I ever have a kid of my own, I'll be preachier - "Lie down with dogs 
and you get up with fleas" will be written on the nursery wall.

  -Shay

[1] I've even agreed with her to drop the "uncle." I have no kids 
myself, so have become "Uncle Shay" to all of my in-laws (gets old 
quickly). That's been curbed a bit since the 13yo dropped it, but I 
still have one more (4yo) niece to go. I don't want to be "Uncle Shay" 
(I had an "aunt" Fritzie) to my wife's entire family when I'm 80 years 
old. After they finish school, my nieces will most likely be 
near-strangers I see once a year on Christmas anyway. I can live with 
their foregoing my proper title.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jeremy M  Praay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 16:57:04
Message: <47951530$1@news.povray.org>
"Shay" <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote in message news:4793698e@news.povray.org...
> Tom Galvin wrote:
> > Shay wrote:
> >>
> >> Excellent. I need to find some pretext to have a long talk with
> >> my niece(13yo) about bad social habits.
> >
> > YMMV but I found repeated short conversations more effective at
> > that age.
>
> Don't know many teenagers, but I think it depends on one's relationship 
> with the kid. In a way, we're fairly close. I knew her parents before she 
> was born and rented a room from them when my niece was a baby. She was 
> calling me "Uncle Shay" before I had even met her aunt. On the other hand, 
> I'm not an uncle to her like my uncles were to me.[1] My uncles had nearly 
> as much authority over me as my parents. They could pull off preaching to 
> me.
>

I had that type of relationship with some of my uncles as well.  I remember 
having at least a couple long talks with 2 of them in particular 
(individually).  I could talk to them about things I would never mention to 
my parents.  In fact, I believe that my life probably would be quite 
different if I hadn't had those few long conversations.

I can't believe that it's been about 20 years since I was a teenager.  Now 
I'm older than my uncles were then, but they still seem much wiser.  :-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 18:12:23
Message: <479526d7$1@news.povray.org>
Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
> "Shay" <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote in message news:4793698e@news.povray.org...
> 
>>Tom Galvin wrote:
>>
>>>Shay wrote:
>>>
>>>>Excellent. I need to find some pretext to have a long talk with
>>>>my niece(13yo) about bad social habits.
>>>
>>>YMMV but I found repeated short conversations more effective at
>>>that age.
>>
>>Don't know many teenagers, but I think it depends on one's relationship 
>>with the kid. In a way, we're fairly close. I knew her parents before she 
>>was born and rented a room from them when my niece was a baby. She was 
>>calling me "Uncle Shay" before I had even met her aunt. On the other hand, 
>>I'm not an uncle to her like my uncles were to me.[1] My uncles had nearly 
>>as much authority over me as my parents. They could pull off preaching to 
>>me.
>>
> 
> 
> I had that type of relationship with some of my uncles as well.  I remember 
> having at least a couple long talks with 2 of them in particular 
> (individually).  I could talk to them about things I would never mention to 
> my parents.  In fact, I believe that my life probably would be quite 
> different if I hadn't had those few long conversations.
> 
> I can't believe that it's been about 20 years since I was a teenager.  Now 
> I'm older than my uncles were then, but they still seem much wiser.  :-) 
> 
> 
Hmmm, I had no such experience, I'm afraid.  The views of my uncles were 
all quite predictable, conservative, and boring and they were always 
anxious to make me aware of them.  I learned that they really didn't 
want conversation they just wanted to rant at a representative 'youth of 
today,' even though I was as disgustingly complacent a little do-bee as 
you could possibly imagine.  But that suited me fine because I didn't 
want to talk and get set up for their ranting against long hair, or rock 
music, or hippie fashions, or student protests, or negro riots, or drug 
use, or modern public sculpture, so I would just sit and shut up and let 
my thoughts wander while they 'set me straight on a few things'.


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 18:15:26
Message: <4795278e$1@news.povray.org>
Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
 > I had that type of relationship with some of my uncles as well.  I
 > remember having at least a couple long talks with 2 of them in
 > particular (individually).  I could talk to them about things I
 > would never mention to my parents.  In fact, I believe that my
 > life probably would be quite different if I hadn't had those few
 > long conversations.

Then maybe I can do some good (do you remember the topics of these 
conversations?), but I need to start by setting a better example.

I have been feeling pretty bad about something that happened a few 
months ago. I was a real food Nazi when I worked in an office, but since 
moving to outdoor employment, I have started to relax a bit, relying on 
my job to keep me lean. That's wrong, because my job won't keep me 
healthy, just healthy-looking (if you call a grown man at 160 lbs 
healthy-looking). Anyway, I was recently at a party at my niece's 
mother's house and was cutting a cake I had made when my niece walked 
into the room. I offered her a piece, which she refused. I KNEW she was 
refusing because she knows that she needs to improve on the junk food 
diet on which she has been raised. She's not overweight, but she is 
ahead of schedule. At 13, she weighs as much as my 33yo wife. I should 
have refused the cake myself, especially since I knew why my niece was 
refusing it. I should have said, "You're right, kid, f*** that cake. 
Tastes like sh** anyway." I HAVE been that smart many times in the past, 
but that day I wasn't. I cut myself a slice and ate it, leaving my 
niece, as the one person in the room sane enough to try and take care of 
herself, all alone. Naturally, she eventually succumbed and had a slice 
herself.

Can't take back the past, but that is the last time anything like that 
will happen. I need to think about these things because my wife and I 
might have a kid ourselves. I don't want to live a lie (or a mostly, but 
not completely true) in front of my kid. One of the artists I linked to 
in my "Lucky to have seen it" post declares on her myspace page that she 
is "interested in natural health, yoga, spirituality, healing, the 
vedas, meditation ... and things of that nature," yet I saw her at the 
bar smoking, drinking, and carrying around an ass through which I'm 
quite sure many a cheeseburger had passed. I'm losing faith in people. 
*I* have to BE what I want to see - want my kid to see - in the world.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 18:33:39
Message: <47952bd3$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:
 > their ranting against long hair, or rock music, or hippie
 > fashions, or student protests, or negro riots, or drug use, or
 > modern public sculpture

I wonder if the 'youth of today' will forever think us stodgy for 
ranting against commercialism?

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 18:47:24
Message: <47952f0c@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
>  > I had that type of relationship with some of my uncles as well.  I
>  > remember having at least a couple long talks with 2 of them in
>  > particular (individually).  I could talk to them about things I
>  > would never mention to my parents.  In fact, I believe that my
>  > life probably would be quite different if I hadn't had those few
>  > long conversations.
> 
> Then maybe I can do some good (do you remember the topics of these 
> conversations?), but I need to start by setting a better example.
> 
> I have been feeling pretty bad about something that happened a few 
> months ago. I was a real food Nazi when I worked in an office, but since 
> moving to outdoor employment, I have started to relax a bit, relying on 
> my job to keep me lean. That's wrong, because my job won't keep me 
> healthy, just healthy-looking (if you call a grown man at 160 lbs 
> healthy-looking). Anyway, I was recently at a party at my niece's 
> mother's house and was cutting a cake I had made when my niece walked 
> into the room. I offered her a piece, which she refused. I KNEW she was 
> refusing because she knows that she needs to improve on the junk food 
> diet on which she has been raised. She's not overweight, but she is 
> ahead of schedule. At 13, she weighs as much as my 33yo wife. I should 
> have refused the cake myself, especially since I knew why my niece was 
> refusing it. I should have said, "You're right, kid, f*** that cake. 
> Tastes like sh** anyway." I HAVE been that smart many times in the past, 
> but that day I wasn't. I cut myself a slice and ate it, leaving my 
> niece, as the one person in the room sane enough to try and take care of 
> herself, all alone. Naturally, she eventually succumbed and had a slice 
> herself.
> 
> Can't take back the past, but that is the last time anything like that 
> will happen. I need to think about these things because my wife and I 
> might have a kid ourselves. I don't want to live a lie (or a mostly, but 
> not completely true) in front of my kid. One of the artists I linked to 
> in my "Lucky to have seen it" post declares on her myspace page that she 
> is "interested in natural health, yoga, spirituality, healing, the 
> vedas, meditation ... and things of that nature," yet I saw her at the 
> bar smoking, drinking, and carrying around an ass through which I'm 
> quite sure many a cheeseburger had passed. I'm losing faith in people. 
> *I* have to BE what I want to see - want my kid to see - in the world.
> 
>  -Shay

I dunno Shay.  My brother is as fine a goal-oriented, 
self-made-successful, athletic, health-conscious, generous, avucular 
example as ever a niece and nephew could want...
and he scares the living crap out of my kids.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 19:03:34
Message: <479532d6$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>  > their ranting against long hair, or rock music, or hippie
>  > fashions, or student protests, or negro riots, or drug use, or
>  > modern public sculpture
> 
> I wonder if the 'youth of today' will forever think us stodgy for 
> ranting against commercialism?
> 
prolly


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Galvin
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 21 Jan 2008 19:09:52
Message: <4795344D.7030807@imp.nospam.org>
Shay wrote:
> I should 
> have refused the cake myself, especially since I knew why my niece was 
> refusing it. I should have said, "You're right, kid, f*** that cake. 
> Tastes like sh** anyway." 

That's the kind of short conversations I had in mind.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jeremy M  Praay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 22 Jan 2008 09:12:39
Message: <4795f9d7$1@news.povray.org>
"Shay" <sha### [at] nonenone> wrote in message news:4795278e$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Then maybe I can do some good (do you remember the topics of these 
> conversations?), but I need to start by setting a better example.

In my case, a lot of them had to do with "girls".  The two uncles with which 
I felt comfortable, were about 10 years younger than my parents (about 20 
years older than me), had lived "interesting lives", and certainly had a 
fairly well-balanced perspective on things.

> I have been feeling pretty bad about something that happened a few months 
> ago. I was a real food Nazi when I worked in an office, but since moving 
> to outdoor employment, I have started to relax a bit, relying on my job to 
> keep me lean.  <snip>

Since getting married, my diet became horrible.  It's not because my wife is 
a bad cook, or I'm a bad cook, but mostly, we just got lazy, and quickly got 
into the habit of fast food.  Only in the last 4 years have I started to 
take control of that part of my life again.  Additionally, I've started 
growing some of my own food (gardening, raising chickens, etc.) and in the 
process, I've come to recognize HOW DIFFERENT my home-grown food is from 
anything at the store.

I read a book called "Pastured Poultry Profits" when I decided that I wanted 
to raise a few chickens for meat last year.  That book probably changed my 
life forever.  All I was curious about was how to raise chickens on 
grass/pasture because it sounded better than keeping them in a poopy chicken 
coop*, but the author really opened my mind to the concept of "buying local" 
and WHY.  I live in an area where I'm surrounded by cows, pigs, chickens, 
corn, you name it, and yet I never realized that most of the livestock 
around me IS NOT what ends up at the grocery store.  Now, we buy a lot of 
our meat (beef/pork) from local farmers, eat our own eggs and chickens, and 
for a few short months, we get our own fresh vegetables.

I'm not into organics, per se, because I don't think there's truly much 
difference.  If a chicken is fed organic grain versus non-organic, is it 
going to be any different?  I doubt it.  But put the chicken outside, on 
pasture, and there's a difference.  I gave a few chickens away last year, 
and this year, I'll probably raise 50-100 meat chickens, just because now, 
so many people want one (or 2 or 5 or 20).  Next year, perhaps even more.

Here's an interesting article discussing pasture-raised chicken eggs:
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Whole-Foods-and-Cooking/2007-10-01/Tests-Reveal-Healthier-Eggs.aspx

But more than that, this entire process gives my life more meaning.  Going 
outside in the morning to service the chickens puts a completely different 
perspective on the entire day and takes away a lot of "the drag" before 
going to the office.  I've spent hours sitting outside in the summer just 
watching the chickens, or collecting grasshoppers for them (they LOVE 
grasshoppers), or whatever.  It's that whole feeling of being connected to 
the land, I think.

LOL, I guess that kinda turned into "Jeremy Praay's 2007".

* They are cooped up for now until the weather warms up (probably in March).


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 22 Jan 2008 13:15:20
Message: <479632b8$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:

 > My brother is as fine a goal-oriented, self-made-successful,
 > athletic, health-conscious, generous, avucular example as ever a
 > niece and nephew could want...  and he scares the living crap out
 > of my kids.

They don't have to like him or in any way want to be like him, but I 
think it's important that they see that there are alternatives. I've 
done myself a lot of harm in life by blindly accepting behaviors for 
which I was never presented an alternative. I was lucky early-on to 
stumble into some of these alternatives through witless rebellion. 
Slowly, I'm figuring out some of the others, but I might have saved 
myself a lot of grief had I (literally) seen as a kid that I could ABC 
instead of XYZ.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 22 Jan 2008 14:43:46
Message: <47964772$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
> 
>  > My brother is as fine a goal-oriented, self-made-successful,
>  > athletic, health-conscious, generous, avucular example as ever a
>  > niece and nephew could want...  and he scares the living crap out
>  > of my kids.
> 
> They don't have to like him or in any way want to be like him, but I 
> think it's important that they see that there are alternatives. I've 
> done myself a lot of harm in life by blindly accepting behaviors for 
> which I was never presented an alternative. I was lucky early-on to 
> stumble into some of these alternatives through witless rebellion. 
> Slowly, I'm figuring out some of the others, but I might have saved 
> myself a lot of grief had I (literally) seen as a kid that I could ABC 
> instead of XYZ.
> 
>  -Shay
Yes I also think that exposure to alternatives, in particular 
alternatives to low achievement, is good.  It is in fact one of the 
greatest comforts to me that my kids have had before them a variety of 
high-achieving, quality people who still keep concerns about status at 
an arms length.  There are a lot of things that a childhood growing up 
in Manhattan lacks, but exposure to high achievers is not one of them.
My daughter has been coached by a gold medalist, and partied at the home 
of Oscar winners; a sizable proportion of my son's HS teachers had 
Ph.D's, but he also works at an after school in our local church which 
has an active AIDS support program, and so on.  My daughter goes to a 
leading HS and her friends are dispersed among another half-dozen of the 
city's top schools.  The networking potential is amazing.


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Galvin
Subject: Re: Jim Charter's 2007
Date: 22 Jan 2008 21:45:52
Message: <4796aa60$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:

> Yes I also think that exposure to alternatives, in particular 
> alternatives to low achievement, is good.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji5_MqicxSo


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.