|
|
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/ladies/6792/
Amusing, much?
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/ladies/6792/action/2105312/
LOL!
But hey, that gets me thinking... Check out this list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes
100 Continue (!!)
101 Switching Protocols (?!)
202 Accepted ;-)
201 Created 0_0
300 Multiple Choices :-D
303 See Other (!)
304 Not Modified ;-)
402 Payment Required (!!!!)
405 Method Not Allowed o_O
406 Not Acceptable (Speaks for itself...)
408 Request Timeout (Heh... LOL!)
409 Conflict (Is this bad?)
410 Gone (Um...)
417 Expectation Failed (oops!)
423 Locked ;-)
415 Unsupported Media Type 0_0
502 Bad Gateway (EEEPS!)
503 Service Unavailable :-(
510 Not Extended O_O
What a choice...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> What a choice...
And if you're curious why those particular numbers are used, the whole
error-numbering scheme was created for FTP, and everyone else adopted
it. So check out the FTP RFC for that.
And nowadays, cell phone carriers seem to issue 6xx error codes too, but
I have no idea what they mean or whether they're following the rules.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
It's not feature creep if you put it
at the end and adjust the release date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|