 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin wrote:
> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>
> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
You think that's bad? Try taking a PC, disconnecting the US keyboard and
hooking up a UK keyboard. Confuses the **** out of people until you load
the correct keymap.
[Unfortunately, we have quite a lot of US keyboards here. I blame Dell...]
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin wrote:
> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>
> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
If you really want to play evil games with people, take a calculator and
rearrange the bottoms the opposite way round. As in, if the buttons are
arranged as
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
change it to
7 8 9
4 5 6
1 2 3
Both arrangements are entirely plausible, and so nobody will think this
strange. Until they try to use it...
PS. I've always wondered... Do German keyboards have that weird
beta-like glyph on them?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Tom Austin wrote:
>
> > I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
> >
> > It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
>
> You think that's bad? Try taking a PC, disconnecting the US keyboard and
> hooking up a UK keyboard. Confuses the **** out of people until you load
> the correct keymap.
>
> [Unfortunately, we have quite a lot of US keyboards here. I blame Dell...]
You think that’s bad, try using a US k/board with Word’s language set to US
English as default and the document’s language set to UK English. Every now and
again my k/board changes to the UK one but the keys are still the US layout.
Only in word. I love it.
BTW German K/boards are different from ours.
BTW2 How can you tell if a keyboard is a French one?
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"scott" <sco### [at] laptop com> wrote in message news:472f982f@news.povray.org...
> Hehe, the old "take a screenshot of a window and set it as the desktop
> wallpaper" trick used to confuse the hell out of even the IT guys at
school
That was a prank going round the company I worked for round about 5 years
ago. Was a good laugh. Someone tried to do it to my PC. Problem was, they
couldn't find Paint, or the control panel. I was running litestep instead of
explorer as a windows shell. Good fun
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible escribió:
> Darren New wrote:
>
>> I suspect she takes the car back to the dealer when she runs out of
>> gas, too.
>
> I don't really know why, but some people become paralysed by fear when
> they go near a computer. Otherwise normal people become unbelievably
> stupid when confronted by a PC. It's as if their brain switches off
> while using one.
"Frequently, a normal, intelligent person loses grasp of all his
faculties when in the presence of a computer."
http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/cs_amnesia.shtml
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Gail Shaw wrote:
> That was a prank going round the company I worked for round about 5 years
> ago. Was a good laugh. Someone tried to do it to my PC. Problem was, they
> couldn't find Paint, or the control panel. I was running litestep instead of
> explorer as a windows shell. Good fun
Heh. I think I tried LiteStep once... Nice idea, but not very useable.
When I was at uni, there was a prank going round involving a file named
BEARDED.EXE. Any person incautious enough to run this program has their
Windoze wallpaper changed to an image of a fat naked women demonstrating
how bushy she is. And I don't mean her face.
I remember sitting next to Pam, and watching her run it, and her then
not knowing how to change the settings back to normal. (Personally, I
would have thought *anybody* would have more sense than to run an
attachment from Rich, but anyway...)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> "Frequently, a normal, intelligent person loses grasp of all his
> faculties when in the presence of a computer."
It's a bit like this:
http://www.xkcd.com/231/
> http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/cs_amnesia.shtml
Customer: "What do you mean guess? I told you everything you need to
know! Now quit messing around and just tell me what I need to do to fix it!"
This sounds *far* too familiar. :-S
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote:
> BTW2 How can you tell if a keyboard is a French one?
AZERTY?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:
> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
The nerdiness of a person can be measured by how long he uses a computer
with a fumbled keycapping setting (but with intact keymapping) before
noticing that the keyboard caps have been changed.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
http://www.google.com/search?q=german+keyboard
...
do you mean "ß"? -> near "backspace"
kk
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>>
>> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
>
> You think that's bad? Try taking a PC, disconnecting the US keyboard and
> hooking up a UK keyboard. Confuses the **** out of people until you load
> the correct keymap.
Don't laugh, it took me about 5 minutes to find the @ sign on my German
keyboard when I first got it. Still haven't got used to the location of the
<>[]{} keys (which I use quite regularly).
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> PS. I've always wondered... Do German keyboards have that weird
> beta-like glyph on them?
Yeh, it also has keys dedicated for a, u and o with umlauts on top.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> The nerdiness of a person can be measured by how long he uses a computer
> with a fumbled keycapping setting (but with intact keymapping) before
> noticing that the keyboard caps have been changed.
one of the greatest nerds I knew had his keyboard layout set to dvorak (sp?)
and the keys actually placed in a totally random order. nobody else could
use his computer.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
scott wrote:
>> The nerdiness of a person can be measured by how long he uses a computer
>> with a fumbled keycapping setting (but with intact keymapping) before
>> noticing that the keyboard caps have been changed.
>
> one of the greatest nerds I knew had his keyboard layout set to dvorak
> (sp?) and the keys actually placed in a totally random order. nobody
> else could use his computer.
We had 1 user who had their mouse buttons swapped. I'm not sure why...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin wrote:
> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
"The system rejects my password unless I'm sitting down when I type it.
What's wrong?"
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Warp wrote:
> Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:
>> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>
>> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
>
> The nerdiness of a person can be measured by how long he uses a computer
> with a fumbled keycapping setting (but with intact keymapping) before
> noticing that the keyboard caps have been changed.
>
They usually spotted it pretty quick as their typing was messed up.
At least in the US the j has a bump used for touch typing.
By swapping the keys their one hand was in the wrong position.
So, people that touch typed didn't get very far.
I had no problem - I don't touch type.
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> Actually normal common sense isn't applicable to new technology.
Rechargable batteries aren't really what I'd call "cutting edge."
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/06 10:31:
> BTW2 How can you tell if a keyboard is a French one?
>
>
> Stephen
>
>
Switch A & Q, switch Z & W, switch M & ;, set the number key to the special
characters.
Canadian French:
Similar to US but: "@" is accessed with AltCar+2, the ] is used for ¸(cedil) and
¨. AltCar+` and <(over the enter) for { and }. The / is used for é (I use the
num keypad for the /)
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
You know you've been raytracing too long when you've tried to scan your face for
a texture.
Quietly Watching
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/06 04:19:
> Darren New wrote:
>
>> I suspect she takes the car back to the dealer when she runs out of
>> gas, too.
>
> I don't really know why, but some people become paralysed by fear when
> they go near a computer. Otherwise normal people become unbelievably
> stupid when confronted by a PC. It's as if their brain switches off
> while using one.
>
> I don't know - perhaps these people think normal common sense isn't
> applicable to new technology?
Go take a look there:
http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/
There is a case where a secretary, who have used her word processor got it
upgraded, and she had to relearn EVERYTHING!
Or that seller who once sayd that you CAN'T multithread on a Pentium!
Or those that beleive that the monitor IS the computer, well before the iMac...
Or several who tried, and managed to, insert a CD into a 3.5" floppy drive, not
to talk about the CDs in 5.25" floppy drives, or the credit cards, or some other
strange stuff...
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
My wife only has sex with me for a purpose. Last night she used me To time an egg.
Rodney Dangerfield
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:08:23 -0500, Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
>Go take a look there:
>
>http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/
>
This one actually made me laugh...
The second day I worked doing phone tech support, I was called by an elderly woman who
was sobbing and panicked. After spending twenty minutes getting her calmed down, I
finally found out what her
problem was. She had been on the Internet and recieved the ever-popular message "This
program has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down." Immediately
afterward, she had heard police
sirens down the road and thought, "They're coming to lock me up!"
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Alain wrote:
> http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/
The one that seriously made *me* laugh was the story about the guy who
wanted to use an American ISP's setup CD. But it didn't work [because he
was in the UK]. So he went to the back of the PC and changed the mains
voltage selector from UK to USA. And the PSU *exploded*!
[I rather suspect it's fake - why would it *explode*? Very amusing
though...]
Or all those ones from people who's PC is on fire (this *surely* must be
absurdly rare) and aren't interested in fleeing to safety, they just
want to save their work or something. (OMG, the guy who asked "How do I
perform a backup? Quickest possible method." Like, dude... you're
worrying about backups *now*? With your PC already on fire? PROPPER
FORWARD PLANNING! LMAO.)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Actually normal common sense isn't applicable to new technology.
>
> Rechargable batteries aren't really what I'd call "cutting edge."
Wait...you can recharge batteries now?
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/06 10:31:
>
> > BTW2 How can you tell if a keyboard is a French one?
> >
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> Switch A & Q, switch Z & W, switch M & ;, set the number key to the special
> characters.
> Canadian French:
> Similar to US but: "@" is accessed with AltCar+2, the ] is used for ¸(cedil) and
> ¨. AltCar+` and <(over the enter) for { and }. The / is used for é (I use the
> num keypad for the /)
>
> --
> Alain
No! They use “French Letters” :)
Brit Joke sorry :)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouth net> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > Stephen wrote:
> >> Actually normal common sense isn't applicable to new technology.
> >
> > Rechargable batteries aren't really what I'd call "cutting edge."
>
> Wait...you can recharge batteries now?
>
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
You always could recharge “non” rechargeable batteries. The manufacturers don’t
like it though.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible a écrit :
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> "Frequently, a normal, intelligent person loses grasp of all his
>> faculties when in the presence of a computer."
>
> It's a bit like this:
>
> http://www.xkcd.com/231/
>
>> http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/cs_amnesia.shtml
Imagine what happens when the cat is sitting on the computer :-D
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
And lo on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:31:46 -0000, Kyle <hob### [at] gate net> did
spake, saying:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:08:23 -0500, Alain <ele### [at] netscape net>
> wrote:
>
>> Go take a look there:
>>
>> http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/
>>
>
> This one actually made me laugh...
>
> The second day I worked doing phone tech support, I was called by an
> elderly woman who was sobbing and panicked. After spending twenty
> minutes getting her calmed down, I finally found out what her
> problem was. She had been on the Internet and recieved the ever-popular
> message "This program has performed an illegal operation and will be
> shut down." Immediately afterward, she had heard police
> sirens down the road and thought, "They're coming to lock me up!"
"This program has tried to do something in a way I don't understand so I'm
going to shut it down" how easy would that have been to use; instead of
illegal this and exception that?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
> Tom Austin wrote:
>
>> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>>
>> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
>
> You think that's bad? Try taking a PC, disconnecting the US keyboard and
> hooking up a UK keyboard. Confuses the **** out of people until you load
> the correct keymap.
>
> [Unfortunately, we have quite a lot of US keyboards here. I blame Dell...]
I installed the German win ME (never touched it before) using a French
keyboard (using the German keymap). I don't speak either language. It
worked tho ;-)
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/06 14:44:
> Warp wrote:
>> Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:
>>> I once swapped the J & K keys on my keyboard at work.
>>
>>> It was great seeing other people try to figure out what was wrong.
>>
>> The nerdiness of a person can be measured by how long he uses a
>> computer
>> with a fumbled keycapping setting (but with intact keymapping) before
>> noticing that the keyboard caps have been changed.
>>
>
>
> They usually spotted it pretty quick as their typing was messed up.
>
> At least in the US the j has a bump used for touch typing.
> By swapping the keys their one hand was in the wrong position.
>
> So, people that touch typed didn't get very far.
> I had no problem - I don't touch type.
>
>
>
> Tom
Swap the "F" and "J" key (the two marked keys), then take all the other keys and
randomly replace them. On the key-pad, leave the "5" in place and replace the
others.
Touch typists won't feel the difference.
Now, you can spot the nerds and touch typists from "ordinary" users. Ordinary
users will get all fucked up, while the advanced users may not even realise that
all the keys are messed up for days, even months...
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
You know you have been raytracing for too long when the animation you
render will be finished after yourself.
Urs Holzer
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/07 03:00:
> Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouth net> wrote:
>> Darren New wrote:
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> Actually normal common sense isn't applicable to new technology.
>>> Rechargable batteries aren't really what I'd call "cutting edge."
>> Wait...you can recharge batteries now?
>>
>> --
>> Tim Cook
>> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
>
>
> You always could recharge “non” rechargeable batteries. The manufacturers
don’t
> like it though.
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
You can, but they don't keep the charge very well. The ones I did recharge
lasted less than half as long as rechargeable ones. They also got warmer during
the recharge.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
A husband is what is left of a man after the nerve is extracted.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v7 nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/06 16:54:
> Alain wrote:
>
>> http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/
>
> The one that seriously made *me* laugh was the story about the guy who
> wanted to use an American ISP's setup CD. But it didn't work [because he
> was in the UK]. So he went to the back of the PC and changed the mains
> voltage selector from UK to USA. And the PSU *exploded*!
>
US voltage = 120V. UK voltage = 240V. Have an underspecs PSU with no protection
and underpar isolation. You can get sparking, grosly over loaded capacitors,
electrolyt capacitor overheat, electrolyt undergoes electrolysis and start to
boil, KABOOM!
Once when playing with a small speaker, I pluged it in a transformer and was
prety unimpressed by the feeble low hum I got, so, I plugged it directly into
the wall socket, hoping for a loud hum. Use a regular electrical plug, hook the
speaker whires in to it, plug it in. Instant POF, flash of light, small cloud of
smoke, smell of ozone and burnt metal, bursted speaker's dome. The coil's whires
got vaporised.
At the time, I was about 10 or 11.
> [I rather suspect it's fake - why would it *explode*? Very amusing
> though...]
>
> Or all those ones from people who's PC is on fire (this *surely* must be
> absurdly rare) and aren't interested in fleeing to safety, they just
> want to save their work or something. (OMG, the guy who asked "How do I
> perform a backup? Quickest possible method." Like, dude... you're
> worrying about backups *now*? With your PC already on fire? PROPPER
> FORWARD PLANNING! LMAO.)
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Boss spelled backwards is 'double-SOB'
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Phil Cook wrote:
> "This program has tried to do something in a way I don't understand so
> I'm going to shut it down" how easy would that have been to use; instead
> of illegal this and exception that?
How about just "the program has malfunctioned, so we're shutting it down"?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> Stephen nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/07 03:00:
> > You always could recharge non-rechargeable batteries. The manufacturers do
> > notlike it though.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> You can, but they don't keep the charge very well. The ones I did recharge
> lasted less than half as long as rechargeable ones. They also got warmer during
> the recharge.
>
They do get warm but I think that it depends on the charger and the current it
uses for charging. Don’t say it! That was a stupid thing to say. Of course it
depends on the current. I built mine myself and charged them at about 20 ma and
IIRC discharge was between 7.5 and 10 ma.
If your batteries are not holding their charge then the discharge cycle is
probably too low.
And that came from another life, one before Pov :)
Also if you were old enough to wire up a mains plug you were old enough to die.
Dear oh dear the things that didn’t kill us. :) I wouldn’t like to put in
writing some of the things that I did.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Orchid XP v7" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:47323256@news.povray.org...
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> "This program has tried to do something in a way I don't understand so
>> I'm going to shut it down" how easy would that have been to use; instead
>> of illegal this and exception that?
>
> How about just "the program has malfunctioned, so we're shutting it down"?
Yes, either would do well, Andy's is more friendly to the "normal" user
(comp. unsavvy).
But the messages didn't turn out friendly because it was written by one of
"our" type: an I.T. nerd / high priest, who disdains communications with and
the intelligence of everyone except other I.T. nerds / high priests.
OK, we might be sensitive, but we never said we're perfect. :-)
Well alright, we imply it sometimes ;-)
--
Brian
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
And lo on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:05:58 -0000, Brian Elliott
<NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> did spake, saying:
> "Orchid XP v7" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
> news:47323256@news.povray.org...
>> Phil Cook wrote:
>>
>>> "This program has tried to do something in a way I don't understand so
>>> I'm going to shut it down" how easy would that have been to use;
>>> instead of illegal this and exception that?
>>
>> How about just "the program has malfunctioned, so we're shutting it
>> down"?
>
> Yes, either would do well, Andy's is more friendly to the "normal" user
> (comp. unsavvy).
Agreed Andy's is better.
> But the messages didn't turn out friendly because it was written by one
> of "our" type: an I.T. nerd / high priest, who disdains communications
> with and the intelligence of everyone except other I.T. nerds / high
> priests.
And for some reason has perpetuated through countless operating systems of
countless versions. I thought Microsoft had an entire department dedicated
to user-friendliness; oh wait it's run by 'us' isn't it :-)
> OK, we might be sensitive, but we never said we're perfect. :-)
> Well alright, we imply it sometimes ;-)
Nobody's perfect, we're just the closest thing there is.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> But the messages didn't turn out friendly because it was written by
>> one of "our" type: an I.T. nerd / high priest, who disdains
>> communications with and the intelligence of everyone except other I.T.
>> nerds / high priests.
Yeah, well, that's why you have the "details" button that gives you
three pages of gibberish that you can pretend to understand.
(I never really understood why programs produce core dumps. I mean,
seriously. What chance is there of anybody *ever* deducing anything
useful from this data? 10^-78?)
> And for some reason has perpetuated through countless operating systems
> of countless versions. I thought Microsoft had an entire department
> dedicated to user-friendliness; oh wait it's run by 'us' isn't it :-)
It's not *run* be us - we just do all the actual *work*. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote in message
news:4731f3f7$1@news.povray.org...
> Once when playing with a small speaker, I pluged it in a transformer and
> was prety unimpressed by the feeble low hum I got, so, I plugged it
> directly into the wall socket, hoping for a loud hum. Use a regular
> electrical plug, hook the speaker whires in to it, plug it in. Instant
> POF, flash of light, small cloud of smoke, smell of ozone and burnt metal,
> bursted speaker's dome. The coil's whires got vaporised.
> At the time, I was about 10 or 11.
I did the same to one of those tiny 3-volt DC motors, like the cog-ended
ones that are in battery-powered toys. A friend bragged at school he'd
plugged one into the mains, and it went really incredibly fast and was
really hot afterwards.
So I did it, and it went instant POF, flash of light, small cloud of smoke,
smell of ozone and the armature flew out of the casing onto the floor. It
was too hot to pick up. No spin. The brushes were all twisted and
blackened and the commutator was scorched.
And in that instant, I knew my friend had lied. At the time, I was about 10
or 11.
Postscript:
Amazingly, the armature winding didn't burn out. Although the bearing face
that had held one end of the shaft in place was completely gone, and the
brushes were wonky, if you held the shaft of the armature in the right
place with your fingers, it would still spin on battery power.
I kept it for a long time as a special memento.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
...I'm beginning to think POV-Ray attracts crazy people... o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> ...I'm beginning to think POV-Ray attracts crazy people... o_O
Yoy would know :)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>> ...I'm beginning to think POV-Ray attracts crazy people... o_O
>
> Yoy would know :)
Yeah - but I thought *I* was the only one...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> > Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> >> ...I'm beginning to think POV-Ray attracts crazy people... o_O
> >
> > Yoy would know :)
>
> Yeah - but I thought *I* was the only one...
What an egoist :)
I suppose that you think that you are special :)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>> Yeah - but I thought *I* was the only one...
>
> What an egoist :)
> I suppose that you think that you are special :)
Oh the irony...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> a écrit dans le message de news:
4733018a$1@news.povray.org...
> Stephen wrote:
>> Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>>> Yeah - but I thought *I* was the only one...
>>
>> What an egoist :)
>> I suppose that you think that you are special :)
>
> Oh the irony...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ
I heard you say "I'm not!" ;-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Brian Elliott escribió:
> But the messages didn't turn out friendly because it was written by one
> of "our" type: an I.T. nerd / high priest, who disdains communications
> with and the intelligence of everyone except other I.T. nerds / high
> priests.
Hehe, I remember one of those "computer stupidities" where the program
gave an internal error saying "type mismatch", but the user typed the
word "mismatch" and it didn't solve the problem.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible escribió:
> (I never really understood why programs produce core dumps. I mean,
> seriously. What chance is there of anybody *ever* deducing anything
> useful from this data? 10^-78?)
The original programmer with access to the sourcecode *can* deduce data
from it.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Brian Elliott escribió:
> I did the same to one of those tiny 3-volt DC motors, like the cog-ended
> ones that are in battery-powered toys. A friend bragged at school he'd
> plugged one into the mains, and it went really incredibly fast and was
> really hot afterwards.
>
> So I did it, and it went instant POF, flash of light, small cloud of
> smoke, smell of ozone and the armature flew out of the casing onto the
> floor. It was too hot to pick up. No spin. The brushes were all
> twisted and blackened and the commutator was scorched.
>
> And in that instant, I knew my friend had lied. At the time, I was
> about 10 or 11.
I was once playing around with the flash of an old instant camera. I
kept saying it was safe because it used two AA batteries. My dad kept
saying it had some kind of transformer to do the flash, so there was
higher voltage inside.
When I walked away shaking after being surprised by the big flash (that
didn't exactly come out of the lamp, but from the circuits I was
touching with the screwdriver), my dad asked me what I had shorted... I
guess I was 10 or 11 too. Seems like a common age to screw up with
electricity?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Hehe, I remember one of those "computer stupidities" where the program
> gave an internal error saying "type mismatch", but the user typed the
> word "mismatch" and it didn't solve the problem.
OK, that's *advanced*!
We have a buggy program that keeps throwing exceptions due to a "pure
virtual function call". I understand this term means something to C++
programmers. Anyway, the user who oversees the system is *convinced*
it's saying it's run out of virtual memory - a condition that has
absolutely nothing to do with the error in question. *sigh*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I
> guess I was 10 or 11 too. Seems like a common age to screw up with
> electricity?
I made a solid-state amplifier glow. o_O
(Actually, you could arguably blame my mum for that one. I asked for a
1A fuse, and she gave me a fuse. I *really* should have paid much more
attention to the "36A" written on it - but my mum assured me that was
only surge protection or something. Hmm.)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> > Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> >> Yeah - but I thought *I* was the only one...
> >
> > What an egoist :)
> > I suppose that you think that you are special :)
>
> Oh the irony...
I’m special, at least I went to a special school :)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Phil Cook wrote:
> And for some reason has perpetuated through countless operating systems
> of countless versions. I thought Microsoft had an entire department
> dedicated to user-friendliness; oh wait it's run by 'us' isn't it :-)
>
Still they produce frontends too slow and crappy for me (as a nerd) :p.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Brian Elliott wrote:
> "Alain" <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote in message
> news:4731f3f7$1@news.povray.org...
>> Once when playing with a small speaker, I pluged it in a transformer
>> and was prety unimpressed by the feeble low hum I got, so, I plugged
>> it directly into the wall socket, hoping for a loud hum. Use a regular
>> electrical plug, hook the speaker whires in to it, plug it in. Instant
>> POF, flash of light, small cloud of smoke, smell of ozone and burnt
>> metal, bursted speaker's dome. The coil's whires got vaporised.
>> At the time, I was about 10 or 11.
>
> I did the same to one of those tiny 3-volt DC motors, like the cog-ended
> ones that are in battery-powered toys. A friend bragged at school he'd
> plugged one into the mains, and it went really incredibly fast and was
> really hot afterwards.
>
Every time I read these I feel more and more sorry for myself for NOT
doing something that stupid (and cool :p) as a kid.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |