 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Darren New wrote:
>>> As of today, all 39 production computers are sending critical failure
>>> messages to my email *and* via SMS to my cell phone. @Whee.
>>
>> Or rather, they would, were they sending such messages. You know what
>> I mean.
>>
> Hmm, I don't get it. Is the milestone that you got all computers to send
> messages on failure, or that all computers had a critical failure at the
> same time? :)
Sorry. Bad wording. The milestone is that the software and the
monitoring subsystem is working well enough that the author of the code
(i.e., me) is willing to actually get calls on the cell phone for every
failure.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> wrote in
news:47232b1c@news.povray.org:
>
> "Steve" <ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet> wrote in message
> news:Xns99D67251B64C7stevezeroppsuklinuxn@203.29.75.35...
>
>> Another name that's still around after all these years. Are you still
>> Angbanding?
>
> Nope. Don't have the time.
>
I don't either, but I don't let that stop me - to my detriment.
Steve
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote
> As of today, all 39 production computers are sending critical failure
> messages to my email *and* via SMS to my cell phone. @Whee.
Of course you and Murphy know that the messaging subsystem will be the first
one to be decomisioned by the failure, right?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
somebody wrote:
> Of course you and Murphy know that the messaging subsystem will be the first
> one to be decomisioned by the failure, right?
I get periodic "the message subsystem is working" messages too. BTDTGTTS.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Of course you and Murphy know that the messaging subsystem will be the
>> first
>> one to be decomisioned by the failure, right?
>
> I get periodic "the message subsystem is working" messages too. BTDTGTTS.
"Hi! This is your system speaking. Just to let you know that there's
absolutely nothing I need to let you know. I just woke you up at 2 AM to
tell you that. Bye!"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
