"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > this looks so wrong. if I read your intent correctly, in C, that would need to
> > be something like:
> Yeah, but it's code copied right out of the functioning .h file, so...
(some languages seem to be "write-only". for me C++, like Perl, assaults the
> I mean, if there's a way to keep all of the functions mostly the way they are
> and somehow get them to work on a sensor argument passed to them...
if you want, use email to send the header and further detail/explanation.
> > can't really comment on the remaining question. I would have thoughr though
> > that there are enough arduino projects on the web to .. analyse and peruse.
> I would have thought so too, but I've spent several fruitless hours searching
> for exactly that and ... no joy. You'd think that SparkFun or Texas Instruments
> would have _some_ sort of information on how to hook up multiple sensors, but
> that seems to be conspicuously absent.
strange. (lateral approach) maybe search through Raspberry PI projects
involving sensors, arduino might get used in those.
Post a reply to this message