So I was bored.  I went through the Object Collection search page, and this is
what I came up with:

Number of modules: 84

Number of modules with on-line documentation: 32

Number of modules that include thumbnails: 83

Number of modules with multiple versions: 27

Number of modules with multiple contributors: 3

Number of modules rated "Completely Compliant" by the contributor: 81

Number of modules confirmed "Completely Compliant" by an administrator: 12

Number of modules contributed by someone other than chrisb that are confirmed
"Completely Compliant" by an administrator: 1

Number of modules with prerequisites: 1
(I did not count DisplayCase or Galaxy.)

Number of user-rated modules: 3
Average rating: 4.33

Number of modules with user comments: 3

Post a reply to this message

And so...? Conclusions?   :-)

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> Number of user-rated modules: 3
> Average rating: 4.33

> Number of modules with user comments: 3

  I feel a bit sad because I'm pretty certain that if this service had been
set up 10 years ago, in the same timespan that it has been now there would
probably have been several hundreds (if not over a thousand) modules, and
a significantly higher percentage of ratings and comments.

  (OTOH the average *quality* of the modules would probably have been
significantly lower. If there's anything positive about the situation is
that mostly the experienced hard-core users are submitting their include
files, and they tend to be of rather high quality.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot <tenDOTlnDOTretniATtoorgedDOTt> wrote:
> And so...? Conclusions?   :-)

Well, I wasn't looking for conclusions, but one thing does stand out:  There is
some mechanism that prioritizes the primary administrator's submissions for
compliance review.  What that mechanism might be, I'm not going to speculate.

Post a reply to this message