> "Chambers" <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote in message
>> nemesis wrote:
>>> that sounds great! I'm guessing you're expecting pure CSG, no meshes?
>> That's the idea, of course.
> In this day and age, that's a real shame.
Don't get me wrong - there's no way I'd turn away a good model if one
got submitted. I just prefer CSG for its flexibility (through macros
and / or parameters), compactness, and the fact that it uses real curves.
Post a reply to this message