 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello,
I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What resolution
should I use?
Thanks in advance,
Oleguer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegocio com> wrote in message
news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> Hello,
>
> I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
resolution
> should I use?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Oleguer
>
>
forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal to
12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, 12 meters and 90 cm. The high 12 meters and the width is 90 cm.
Regards,
Oleguer
news:411bd917$1@news.povray.org...
> "Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegociocom> wrote in message
> news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
> resolution
> > should I use?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Oleguer
> >
> >
>
> forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal to
> 12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ohhhhh, no, I'm sorry. That's 1'2 meters and 90 cm.
Really sorry.
news:411be732$1@news.povray.org...
> Yes, 12 meters and 90 cm. The high 12 meters and the width is 90 cm.
>
> Regards,
> Oleguer
>
> news:411bd917$1@news.povray.org...
> > "Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegociocom> wrote in message
> > news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
> > resolution
> > > should I use?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Oleguer
> > >
> > >
> >
> > forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal
to
> > 12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You are ok.
1 mt = 100 cmt then 1200x900 cmt = 12x9 mt.
Anyway the resolution is more related to the printer resolution, if your
printer has by example a resolution of 300 dpi (dot per inch) and you image
is 1200x900 cm = to 472.4 x 354.3 inches then the image in pixels is =
141720 x 106290 or (1200/2,54*300)x(900/2,54*300). And yes, is freaking huge
:D
Salu2.
news:411bd917$1@news.povray.org...
> "Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegociocom> wrote in message
> news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
> resolution
> > should I use?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Oleguer
> >
> >
>
> forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal to
> 12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ricardo Miguel Pereyra <no### [at] spamcom> wrote:
> Anyway the resolution is more related to the printer resolution, if your
> printer has by example a resolution of 300 dpi (dot per inch) and you image
> is 1200x900 cm = to 472.4 x 354.3 inches then the image in pixels is =
> 141720 x 106290 or (1200/2,54*300)x(900/2,54*300). And yes, is freaking huge
> :D
POV-Ray can't render an image that big simply because the image file
would be too large.
Well, the 32-bit version of POV-Ray can't. You'll have to use the 64-bit
version is a 64-bit system.
But anyway, there was a mistake by one order of magnitude in the original
request, so the image only needs to be a hundred times smaller.
--
plane{-x+y,-1pigment{bozo color_map{[0rgb x][1rgb x+y]}turbulence 1}}
sphere{0,2pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission 1density{spherical
density_map{[0rgb 0][.5rgb<1,.5>][1rgb 1]}turbulence.9}}}scale
<1,1,3>hollow}text{ttf"timrom""Warp".1,0translate<-1,-.1,2>}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No, I did a mistake. The size is 1'2 meters and 90 cm.
Im sorry.
What do you do think about it?
news:411be907@news.povray.org...
> You are ok.
> 1 mt = 100 cmt then 1200x900 cmt = 12x9 mt.
>
> Anyway the resolution is more related to the printer resolution, if your
> printer has by example a resolution of 300 dpi (dot per inch) and you
image
> is 1200x900 cm = to 472.4 x 354.3 inches then the image in pixels is =
> 141720 x 106290 or (1200/2,54*300)x(900/2,54*300). And yes, is freaking
huge
> :D
>
> Salu2.
>
> news:411bd917$1@news.povray.org...
> > "Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegociocom> wrote in message
> > news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
> > resolution
> > > should I use?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Oleguer
> > >
> > >
> >
> > forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal
to
> > 12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oleguer Vilella nous apporta ses lumieres ainsi en ce 13/08/2004 02:14... :
>
>>1 mt = 100 cmt then 1200x900 cmt = 12x9 mt.
>>
>>Anyway the resolution is more related to the printer resolution, if your
>>printer has by example a resolution of 300 dpi (dot per inch) and you
>>
>>
>image
>
>
>>is 1200x900 cm = to 472.4 x 354.3 inches then the image in pixels is =
>>141720 x 106290 or (1200/2,54*300)x(900/2,54*300). And yes, is freaking
>>
>>
>huge
>
>
>>:D
>>
>>Salu2.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Often, for large images (over a feet whide or high, even more so for
around a meter), you are assumed to look from some distance. Taking this
into consideration, it can be possible to use a MUCH lower resolution
and use rescaling when printing. Just look at advertisement in the metro
(if your city have one), or street level billboards. If you look close,
it's *VERY* grainy, but get's OK if you get back a few steps, even 1
meter is generaly enough. It's very easy to print 100*100 dots for every
1*1 pixel... and using error diffusion dithering, you may never notice
that each pixel is repeated 100*100 times.
Remember that you can print a 72 DPI image at 1600 DPI, without
shrinking it, it just have a lot of very fine dithering.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK, the hard way is trace the image in printer resolution.
first translate from metric to inches: 1,2 mt = 47,24 inches // 0,90 mt =
35,43 inches
next step is use the printer resolution, let say for a 300 dpi printer
resolution: 47,24 inches = 14172 pixels // 35,43 inches = 10629 pixels.
(multiply the size in inches by the resolution in dpi)
then your ouput in pov need to be 14172 x 10629.
The easy way is render the image in a more reliable size without change the
relation w/h = 1.3333~ and scaling later at print. by example 2362 x 1772
pixels and scaling in a factor of 6 or 600%.
Sorry my ugly english, i do my best
Salu2.
news:411c5dba$1@news.povray.org...
> No, I did a mistake. The size is 1'2 meters and 90 cm.
> Im sorry.
> What do you do think about it?
>
>
> news:411be907@news.povray.org...
> > You are ok.
> > 1 mt = 100 cmt then 1200x900 cmt = 12x9 mt.
> >
> > Anyway the resolution is more related to the printer resolution, if your
> > printer has by example a resolution of 300 dpi (dot per inch) and you
> image
> > is 1200x900 cm = to 472.4 x 354.3 inches then the image in pixels is =
> > 141720 x 106290 or (1200/2,54*300)x(900/2,54*300). And yes, is freaking
> huge
> > :D
> >
> > Salu2.
> >
> > news:411bd917$1@news.povray.org...
> > > "Oleguer Vilella" <ole### [at] infonegociocom> wrote in message
> > > news:411bd4ba@news.povray.org...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I did an image and I have to print in a 1200x900 cm poster. What
> > > resolution
> > > > should I use?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Oleguer
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > forgive my non-metric upbringing, but isn't 1200x900 centimeters equal
> to
> > > 12x9 meters? that's freaking huge.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
