|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I'm a new user of Povray. It's an amazing program!!.I would like to know if
it is posible to create a physicals moldels with PovRay, like for example a
simple pendulum.
Thanks
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi!
> I'm a new user of Povray.
Welcome!
> I would like to know if it is posible to create a physicals
> moldels with PovRay, like for example a simple pendulum.
It's not possible with the official version, but there's an unofficial
patch called SimPOV, which can be found at
http://www-public.tu-bs.de:8080/~y0013390/simpov/
It does exactly what you're looking for :)
HTH,
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
>
>> I would like to know if it is posible to create a physicals
>
> > moldels with PovRay, like for example a simple pendulum.
> It's not possible with the official version, [...]
Of course you can render a simple pendulum in official POV-Ray, either
by precalculating the movement and rendering it or by doing a simple
simulation in POV-SDL (in fact for a pendulum this would be way more
efficient than using the Mechsim patch because you can do it in 1D while
Mechsim can only simulate it in 3D).
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi!
>>> I would like to know if it is posible to create a physicals
>>> moldels with PovRay, like for example a simple pendulum.
>> It's not possible with the official version, [...]
> Of course you can render a simple pendulum in official POV-Ray
Yeah. I know that. Of course you can render all kind of stuff in
POV-Ray, and model the correct behaviour either by SDL, by hand or by
3rd-party apps. But that's not the point IMHO. Andres searches a
possibility to "create physical models". I think the pendulum was only
an example. And you're the last person one has to tell that SDL is not
the best way to create those (more complex) models ;)
But you're right, I should have pointed out that one could also do the
calculations in pure SDL...
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you very much for the quick answer!!!
> Yeah. I know that. Of course you can render all kind of stuff in
> POV-Ray, and model the correct behaviour either by SDL, by hand or by
> 3rd-party apps. But that's not the point IMHO
Excuse me, I don't understand what is SDL and IMHO. But I have been seen
that sim-Pov in Christoph's Page is very very interesting and I want to
study in more detail.
Thanks again!!!
news:41001e54@news.povray.org...
> Hi!
>
> >>> I would like to know if it is posible to create a physicals
> >>> moldels with PovRay, like for example a simple pendulum.
>
> >> It's not possible with the official version, [...]
>
> > Of course you can render a simple pendulum in official POV-Ray
>
> Yeah. I know that. Of course you can render all kind of stuff in
> POV-Ray, and model the correct behaviour either by SDL, by hand or by
> 3rd-party apps. But that's not the point IMHO. Andres searches a
> possibility to "create physical models". I think the pendulum was only
> an example. And you're the last person one has to tell that SDL is not
> the best way to create those (more complex) models ;)
>
> But you're right, I should have pointed out that one could also do the
> calculations in pure SDL...
>
>
> Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Excuse me, I don't understand what is SDL and IMHO. But I have been
> seen that sim-Pov in Christoph's Page is very very interesting and I
> want to study in more detail.
Yes, Cristoph's website is very useful, not least because of his
Sim-PoV.
SDL = scene description language, the language .pov files are written
in.
IMHO = in my humble opinion. It just means that the writer is offering
his opinion, not a generally known fact.
Daniel
--
Misinformation followed us like a plague You can beat us with wires
Nobody knew from time to time You can beat us with chains
If the plans had changed You can run out your rules but you know
.: www.doublezero.uklinux.net :. You can't outrun the history train
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Andres Rojas" <jat### [at] telefonicanet> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a new user of Povray. It's an amazing program!!.I would like to know if
> it is posible to create a physicals moldels with PovRay, like for example a
> simple pendulum.
>
> Thanks
I didn't finish it yet, but you may take a look at a system I'm developing
for robotics simulations (actually rigid-body dynamics). There are some
videos at:
http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~dmbasso/phi/
There you find the source code for the newton cradle (3 pendulums) too.
Cheers,
Daniel
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ohhh!! It's great your link. It's just what it was looking for. But I'm
lost. What version of PovRay did you used? You used Megapov or SimPov? I
have tried to compile your source file of newton simulation and I have
several problems. I used Megapov version 1.0 and Povray 3.6 but they seem
there are incompalible on a Windows XP machine.
Thanks.
news:web.4101ef545f4c2bc1477643100@news.povray.org...
> "Andres Rojas" <jat### [at] telefonicanet> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a new user of Povray. It's an amazing program!!.I would like to know
if
> > it is posible to create a physicals moldels with PovRay, like for
example a
> > simple pendulum.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> I didn't finish it yet, but you may take a look at a system I'm developing
> for robotics simulations (actually rigid-body dynamics). There are some
> videos at:
>
> http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~dmbasso/phi/
>
> There you find the source code for the newton cradle (3 pendulums) too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Andres Rojas" <jat### [at] telefonicanet> wrote:
> Ohhh!! It's great your link. It's just what it was looking for.
Thank you :)
> But I'm
> lost. What version of PovRay did you used? You used Megapov or SimPov?
I use povray 3.5 for rendering, but the physics are done through my
framework (that uses the Open Dynamics Engine library).
> I have tried to compile your source file of newton simulation and I have
> several problems. I used Megapov version 1.0 and Povray 3.6 but they seem
> there are incompalible on a Windows XP machine.
Those source files are in Lua syntax, and are read by Phi (my robotics
framework) to get the scene description. It's not an extension to the
PovRay SDL, so indeed it couldn't be successfully read by povray or
megapov.
Once Phi is ready for the masses you'll be noticed ;)
Cheers,
Daniel
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |