POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.newusers : height fields.... Server Time
5 Sep 2024 06:15:34 EDT (-0400)
  height fields.... (Message 11 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: height fields....
Date: 5 Dec 2001 17:01:10
Message: <slrna0t698.fe0.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 22:57:53 +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> 
> 
> Ron Parker wrote:
>> 
>> Past povray versions had a known bug.
>> 
> 
> In this case it's of course reasonable to presume that programs like
> gforge took the wrong format from Povray.  
> 
>> Has anyone tested POVWin's 16-bit PNG output on a Mac?  I seem to remember
>> that we did that when this first came up and it worked okay, leading me to
>> believe that it's all those windows apps that are broken.
>> 
> 
> I just tested with xv and gimp BTW, the both behave just like the Windows
> programs.

The goal is to test on a big-endian machine, so that test is inconclusive.

-- 
plane{-z,-3normal{crackle scale.2#local a=5;#while(a)warp{repeat x flip x}rotate
z*60#local a=a-1;#end translate-9*x}pigment{rgb 1}}light_source{-9red 1rotate 60
*z}light_source{-9rgb y rotate-z*60}light_source{9-z*18rgb z}text{ttf"arial.ttf"
"RP".01,0translate-<.6,.4,.02>pigment{bozo}}light_source{-z*3rgb-.2}//Ron Parker


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: height fields....
Date: 5 Dec 2001 17:20:12
Message: <3C0E9DC9.58A4AB9@gmx.de>
Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> > I just tested with xv and gimp BTW, the both behave just like the Windows
> > programs.
> 
> The goal is to test on a big-endian machine, so that test is inconclusive.
> 

All right, just wanted to mention it.

BTW, how about:

http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngsuite.html

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: height fields....
Date: 5 Dec 2001 19:12:42
Message: <slrna0tdvt.fil.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On 5 Dec 2001 16:32:16 -0500, Ron Parker wrote:
> Has anyone tested POVWin's 16-bit PNG output on a Mac?  I seem to remember
> that we did that when this first came up and it worked okay, leading me to
> believe that it's all those windows apps that are broken.

Never mind. I found it... color 16bpp images are okay, gray ones are 
broken.  9-15 bpp are probably broken, too, but in a different way.  
It'll be fixed in the next beta.

-- 
#macro R(L P)sphere{L F}cylinder{L P F}#end#macro P(V)merge{R(z+a z)R(-z a-z)R(a
-z-z-z a+z)torus{1F clipped_by{plane{a 0}}}translate V}#end#macro Z(a F T)merge{
P(z+a)P(z-a)R(-z-z-x a)pigment{rgbt 1}hollow interior{media{emission T}}finish{
reflection.1}}#end Z(-x-x.2y)Z(-x-x.4x)camera{location z*-10rotate x*90}


Post a reply to this message

From: Paul D  Jones
Subject: Re: height fields....
Date: 7 Dec 2001 08:40:14
Message: <3C10C715.137A07ED@psu.edu>
never mind, I fixed it, I was actually making the hf image at a lower
resolution than I had thought.... doh....!

"Paul D. Jones" wrote:

> Howdy povers!
>
> I seem to be having a wee bit o' difficulty in making a nice
> heightfield. I have read the docs and tried a bunch of things
> (hf_gray_16, tga and png formats etc...) but no matter what I try, I
> cannot make a smooth height field.
>
> I use an orthographic scene file with an agate pattern to generate the
> required hf image (1024 x 768 aa 0.3), then in another scene use the
> smooth command and I get a stepped effect.
>
> Does any on have any suggestions as to what would make a good hf? Would
> an isosurface (shudder.....) be better?
>
> -thanks
>
> paul (a three year pov user, and still a new user!! argh!!  :-)


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.