|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Sorry to keep acting stupid with isosurfaces, but I have a really dumb
question... I know that isosurfaces have a bug where the contained_by
shape is not translated if the isosurface itself is translated, is there
a way to place an iso anywhere else other than <0,0,0> (assuming I am
using a sphere as the container). I tried the following:
isosurface {
blah
blah
blah
contained_by {sphere {<0,1,0> 1}}
blah blah blah}
and the object is squished, ie.... it is not translated but rather
deformed in a most unpleasant way.
Anybody got any ideas? Or am I missing something so obvious that I
should hide under the bed in shame?? :-)
-paul
--
-------------------------------------------#
Paul Daniel Jones
120 Chandlee Laboratory
Penn State University
814-865-2090
pdj### [at] psu edu
http://research.chem.psu.edu/glassgrp/paul
--------------------------------------------#
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 08:37:23 -0500, Paul Daniel Jones wrote:
>Sorry to keep acting stupid with isosurfaces, but I have a really dumb
>question... I know that isosurfaces have a bug where the contained_by
>shape is not translated if the isosurface itself is translated, is there
>a way to place an iso anywhere else other than <0,0,0> (assuming I am
>using a sphere as the container). I tried the following:
What if you translate the container separately?
isosurface {
blah blah blah
translate <0,1,0>
contained_by {sphere {0,1 translate <0,1,0>}}
blah blah blah
}
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |