Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 7:30 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > 3.Blender and povray (unofficial version): install in Windows
> > http://youtu.be/OfRY999dlno
>
> Hi, I downloaded your exporter after watching the install tutorial.
> 1. You go too fast in the video.
> 2. When rendering using your exporter the *.pov file has the line:
> #include "shapes3.inc"
> Where does that come from? Did you forget to include it in your download?
>
> --
> Regards
>      Stephen

Povray standard no have "shapes3.inc"
I download and install:
http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/pov__eng.htm
help you google

Post a reply to this message

On 28/09/2013 4:14 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

>
> Povray standard no have "shapes3.inc"

Correct.

> I download and install:
> http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/pov__eng.htm

It is good to see that Friedrich is still working away and updating his 
site.

> help you google
>

True but I should not need to do that and everything you need to run 
something should be included with the package. Or mentioned.
Documentation is very important.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 09/28/2013 11:14 AM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 25/09/2013 7:30 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>>> 3.Blender and povray (unofficial version): install in Windows
>>> http://youtu.be/OfRY999dlno
>>
>> Hi, I downloaded your exporter after watching the install tutorial.
>> 1. You go too fast in the video.
>> 2. When rendering using your exporter the *.pov file has the line:
>> #include "shapes3.inc"
>> Where does that come from? Did you forget to include it in your download?
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
> Povray standard no have "shapes3.inc"
> I download and install:
> http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/pov__eng.htm
> help you google
>
>
>
>

final 3.7 /will/ have ... Friedrich contributed that stuff (and more) to 
the final release

http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Shapes3.inc

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

>
> True but I should not need to do that and everything you need to run
> something should be included with the package. Or mentioned.
> Documentation is very important.
>
> --
> Regards
>      Stephen

Yes, sorry!
But my version is development.
Addon will have the include folder where external inc-files and internal
inc-files will take place also.
Will probably(well) write down models in the inc files later.Will add button
"create include"
It will clear the 3D viewport :)

Post a reply to this message

On 28/09/2013 6:17 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>>
>> True but I should not need to do that and everything you need to run
>> something should be included with the package. Or mentioned.
>> Documentation is very important.
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
> Yes, sorry!
> But my version is development.
> Addon will have the include folder where external inc-files and internal
> inc-files will take place also.
> Will probably(well) write down models in the inc files later.Will add button
> "create include"
> It will clear the 3D viewport :)
>

Understood, and it sounds good.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

James Holsenback <nom### [at] nonecom> wrote:

>
> final 3.7 /will/ have ... Friedrich contributed that stuff (and more) to
> the final release
>
> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Shapes3.inc

Thanks! Very good! :)

Post a reply to this message

Hi LanuHum
	I have a comment but this group is not the place to do it. I posted it 
in: povray.tools.general.

LanuHum Blender PovRay exporter

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Hi LanuHum
>  I have a comment but this group is not the place to do it. I posted it
> in: povray.tools.general.
>
> LanuHum Blender PovRay exporter
>
> --
> Regards
>      Stephen

Let there will be one topic

>Hi LanuHum
>I created a simple cube and assigned a material (material.000).
>I selected a side and assigned another material (material.001) to it.
>When I rendered the cube, the whole cube was rendered with (material.001).

>Looking at the code.
>You are using mesh.
>I think that you should use mesh2 to assign different materials to
>different faces.

--
>Regards
>     Stephen

Yes! I studied it.
Mesh2 has many lines, mesh is more compact.Heavy scenes difficult parsing
Mesh has different materials too, but badly works with glass: ior, caustic and
so on. Therefore I cleaned this part of a code.Image_map hoping to compensate
it.
Most likely, I will provide to the user independently to choose: mesh or mesh2
I still badly dealt with a code which is writing down mesh2 from Blender
I am not the professional programmer.
I will try! :)

Post a reply to this message

On 29/09/2013 2:02 PM, LanuHum wrote:

>
> Let there will be one topic

Yes but not in the news-submissions, group.
This is not the place, my friend.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 29/09/2013 2:02 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>
> >
> > Let there will be one topic
>
> Yes but not in the news-submissions, group.
> This is not the place, my friend.
>
> --
> Regards
>      Stephen

o.k

Post a reply to this message