I'm currently working on a program that converts a Minecraft world into a
POV-Ray scene, and I'm having real trouble with water.

To make water blocks act like a solid object so that I don't see the sides of
each block, I take all the water blocks in the world and put them into a CSG
merge object, which in theory should make them solid.  Unfortunately, it isn't
working out that way.

If each block in the merge is exactly 1 unit wide, then I get lots of odd pixels
where the water meets the land underwater.  This is understandable, since the
water block edge is coincident with the land block.  So as a work-around, I
tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
creates odd seams at the surface of the water.

Example renders are at http://imgur.com/a/rCDCG

A couple notes about my scene:
- Vertical runs of the same block type are saved as a single tall box object to
reduce the number of objects in the scene.
- The hole in the world is from an optimization that stops looking for blocks
below a certain y-coordinate, again, to reduce objects.

Any ideas how to fix the coincident surface problem where the water meets land
without create a coincident surface problem at the surface of the water without
manually creating a mesh?

Post a reply to this message

"Sohcahtoa" <kil### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> I'm currently working on a program that converts a Minecraft world into a
> POV-Ray scene, and I'm having real trouble with water.
>
> To make water blocks act like a solid object so that I don't see the sides of
> each block, I take all the water blocks in the world and put them into a CSG
> merge object, which in theory should make them solid.  Unfortunately, it isn't
> working out that way.
>
> If each block in the merge is exactly 1 unit wide, then I get lots of odd pixels
> where the water meets the land underwater.  This is understandable, since the
> water block edge is coincident with the land block.  So as a work-around, I
> tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
> creates odd seams at the surface of the water.
>
> Example renders are at http://imgur.com/a/rCDCG
>
> A couple notes about my scene:
> - Vertical runs of the same block type are saved as a single tall box object to
> reduce the number of objects in the scene.
> - The hole in the world is from an optimization that stops looking for blocks
> below a certain y-coordinate, again, to reduce objects.
>
> Any ideas how to fix the coincident surface problem where the water meets land
> without create a coincident surface problem at the surface of the water without
> manually creating a mesh?

I created a work-around by translating every other box by 0.00001*y in a
checkerboard-like fashion.  The result can be seen at
http://i.imgur.com/NnOFZHh.jpg

While it seems to have worked (I can't see the vertical edges that get created),
its not a solution I'm happy with.  If the camera is in just the right spot in
the right resolution, it could create ugly edges.

Post a reply to this message

Sohcahtoa wrote:

> I tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
> creates odd seams at the surface of the water.

If I understand correctly what your are doing, you get a 0.04
unit wide strip of coincident surfaces at the top (and bottom)
of the surface where those faces overlap slightly

So you may need to introduce 4 heights/levels for each group
of four neighboring cubes (you can try a checker-board pattern
first to see if this is the cause of the problem but it will
still have overlapping corners).

Post a reply to this message

> I'm currently working on a program that converts a Minecraft world into a
> POV-Ray scene, and I'm having real trouble with water.
>
> To make water blocks act like a solid object so that I don't see the sides of
> each block, I take all the water blocks in the world and put them into a CSG
> merge object, which in theory should make them solid.  Unfortunately, it isn't
> working out that way.
>
> If each block in the merge is exactly 1 unit wide, then I get lots of odd pixels
> where the water meets the land underwater.  This is understandable, since the
> water block edge is coincident with the land block.  So as a work-around, I
> tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
> creates odd seams at the surface of the water.
>
> Example renders are at http://imgur.com/a/rCDCG
>
> A couple notes about my scene:
> - Vertical runs of the same block type are saved as a single tall box object to
> reduce the number of objects in the scene.
> - The hole in the world is from an optimization that stops looking for blocks
> below a certain y-coordinate, again, to reduce objects.
>
> Any ideas how to fix the coincident surface problem where the water meets land
> without create a coincident surface problem at the surface of the water without
> manually creating a mesh?
>
>

Looking at your sample, you could use a single large block for the 
water, or even a simple plane.
A large block would be dimentioned to cover the surface of the water 
area and be thick enough to reatch the bottom of the "lake".

If you need/want to have dry openings, you'll need to cut some holes 
using a difference.

Another way would be to make some stacked prisms, one for each layer and 
merge them. That way, you don't need to cut holes, but would get longer 
rendering times.




Alain

Post a reply to this message

Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> Sohcahtoa wrote:
>
> > I tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
> > creates odd seams at the surface of the water.
>
> If I understand correctly what your are doing, you get a 0.04
> unit wide strip of coincident surfaces at the top (and bottom)
> of the surface where those faces overlap slightly
>
> So you may need to introduce 4 heights/levels for each group
> of four neighboring cubes (you can try a checker-board pattern
> first to see if this is the cause of the problem but it will
> still have overlapping corners).

Yeah, I did a checkerboard pattern of two heights and it fixed the problem.
Oddly enough, I don't have any coincident surface artifacts at the corners like
I would expect.

Post a reply to this message

Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>
> Looking at your sample, you could use a single large block for the
> water, or even a simple plane.
> A large block would be dimentioned to cover the surface of the water
> area and be thick enough to reatch the bottom of the "lake".
>
> If you need/want to have dry openings, you'll need to cut some holes
> using a difference.
>
> Another way would be to make some stacked prisms, one for each layer and
> merge them. That way, you don't need to cut holes, but would get longer
> rendering times.

In that sample scene, yes.

Are you familiar with the game Minecraft?  I'm writing a program that converts a
world created in Minecraft into a POV-Ray scene.  Where the water blocks are can
be somewhat random, and not necessarily in large chunks that can easily be
turned into a single large box or plane.  Bodies of water can be as small as a
single block, or spanning miles across.  Their shape will vary just as much.

Post a reply to this message

> Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
>> Sohcahtoa wrote:
>>
>>> I tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
>>> creates odd seams at the surface of the water.
>>
>> If I understand correctly what your are doing, you get a 0.04
>> unit wide strip of coincident surfaces at the top (and bottom)
>> of the surface where those faces overlap slightly
>>
>> So you may need to introduce 4 heights/levels for each group
>> of four neighboring cubes (you can try a checker-board pattern
>> first to see if this is the cause of the problem but it will
>> still have overlapping corners).
>
> Yeah, I did a checkerboard pattern of two heights and it fixed the problem.
> Oddly enough, I don't have any coincident surface artifacts at the corners like
> I would expect.
>
>
As those are small, only 0.04 squares, you may miss them easily.

Post a reply to this message

> Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>>
>> Looking at your sample, you could use a single large block for the
>> water, or even a simple plane.
>> A large block would be dimentioned to cover the surface of the water
>> area and be thick enough to reatch the bottom of the "lake".
>>
>> If you need/want to have dry openings, you'll need to cut some holes
>> using a difference.
>>
>> Another way would be to make some stacked prisms, one for each layer and
>> merge them. That way, you don't need to cut holes, but would get longer
>> rendering times.
>
> In that sample scene, yes.
>
> Are you familiar with the game Minecraft?  I'm writing a program that converts a
> world created in Minecraft into a POV-Ray scene.  Where the water blocks are can
> be somewhat random, and not necessarily in large chunks that can easily be
> turned into a single large box or plane.  Bodies of water can be as small as a
> single block, or spanning miles across.  Their shape will vary just as much.
>
>

I've heard/read a good deal about it, but never played it.

If you use a plane for the water, it's easy to cut holes in it's 
surface, just use a clipped_by{box{Corner1, Corner2 inverse}}
This will punch a hole without any side as you would with a difference.

Once the hole is made, you don't need to bother with the shape of the 
underground part.

A single plane can take care of all your water areas, no mather how 
large, what shape or number as long as they are at the same level. I 
don't know if you can have water blocks on a hill or down a valey... but 
some prism may do the trick.



Alain

Post a reply to this message

Am 07.03.2013 02:55, schrieb Alain:

> A single plane can take care of all your water areas, no mather how
> large, what shape or number as long as they are at the same level.

... and here the trouble begins ;-)

Post a reply to this message

"Sohcahtoa" <kil### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> I'm currently working on a program that converts a Minecraft world into a
> POV-Ray scene, and I'm having real trouble with water.
>
> To make water blocks act like a solid object so that I don't see the sides of
> each block, I take all the water blocks in the world and put them into a CSG
> merge object, which in theory should make them solid.  Unfortunately, it isn't
> working out that way.
>
> If each block in the merge is exactly 1 unit wide, then I get lots of odd pixels
> where the water meets the land underwater.  This is understandable, since the
> water block edge is coincident with the land block.  So as a work-around, I
> tried making each water block slightly large (1.02 blocks wide), but this
> creates odd seams at the surface of the water.
>
> Example renders are at http://imgur.com/a/rCDCG
>
> A couple notes about my scene:
> - Vertical runs of the same block type are saved as a single tall box object to
> reduce the number of objects in the scene.
> - The hole in the world is from an optimization that stops looking for blocks
> below a certain y-coordinate, again, to reduce objects.
>
> Any ideas how to fix the coincident surface problem where the water meets land
> without create a coincident surface problem at the surface of the water without
> manually creating a mesh?

I would think it would be easiest to convert each mass of different block types
into a single mesh by mapping the corner vertices.  make each mass smaller than
it has to be by some tolerance value.  The problem I see with this is changes in
ior when going from water to air, it might make the blocks under the water
render improperly.

One thing you could try is shifting water vertices down and outward, so that
they pass a little under the surface of surrounding blocks.

Are you planning to model everything, or only the surface?  Your conversion
files will be awfully large if you model everything.

Regards,
A.D.B.

Post a reply to this message