 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I know I've asked a similar question before, but it's been a while, and I'd
prefer a new thread that I can browse to quickly.
When attaching text to a path (such as a spline or other function) is whitespace
taken into account? E.g., are the proper whitespace rules followed, so that the
transition from one character to the next is the same as it normally is?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Your post shows inside the old thread, which made it appear almost at
the top of the thread list. Thunderbird orders by the date the thread
was created, not by the most recent post. Better try again, or a lot of
people will miss your message :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2008/01/09 12:30:
> Your post shows inside the old thread, which made it appear almost at
> the top of the thread list. Thunderbird orders by the date the thread
> was created, not by the most recent post. Better try again, or a lot of
> people will miss your message :)
Apears treaded corectly here, using Thunderbird. Set to view by tread, new at
the end.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you can logically
converse with members of the opposite sex without spitting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Your post shows inside the old thread, which made it appear almost at
> the top of the thread list. Thunderbird orders by the date the thread
> was created, not by the most recent post. Better try again, or a lot of
> people will miss your message :)
Thunderbird will also show a new thread as a reply to an older one if
the titles are the same and strict threading is not turned on. It can be
fixed, though.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Stop_threading_by_subject
This thread appears correct to me with those settings.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>I know I've asked a similar question before, but it's been a while, and I'd
> prefer a new thread that I can browse to quickly.
>
> When attaching text to a path (such as a spline or other function) is
> whitespace
> taken into account? E.g., are the proper whitespace rules followed, so
> that the
> transition from one character to the next is the same as it normally is?
If you are using Spline_Trans to place letters then the spacing
is up to you...
In some spline with a time index, the distance between points
at regular time intervals is not required to be spaced evenly.
Here's a macro to determine the length of a portion of a spline...
// calculate the length of a spline
#macro Len_Spline(Espl begin_at stop_at num)
#local c = 1/num;
#local V1 = Espl(begin_at);
#local result = 0;
#while (c <= 1)
#local V2 = Espl( c*(stop_at - begin_at) + begin_at);
#local result = result + vlength(V2-V1);
#local V1 = V2;
#local c = c + 1/num;
#end
(result)
#end
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcast net> wrote:
> If you are using Spline_Trans to place letters then the spacing
> is up to you...
> In some spline with a time index, the distance between points
> at regular time intervals is not required to be spaced evenly.
Ah, so it's not automatic. I was hoping it was. In SVG, for instance, you can
wrap text along a spline, and the proper positioning of each character is
retained.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
