 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I implemented motion_blur from MegaPov in PovRay 3.5. Interest?
Jozef
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:59:27 EDT, "Jozef Gatial" <gat### [at] contal sk> wrote:
> I implemented motion_blur from MegaPov in PovRay 3.5. Interest?
You did it only for yourself ?
:-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jozef Gatial" <gat### [at] contalsk> wrote in message
news:web.3db54baff1eec10c76ced8e90@news.povray.org...
> I implemented motion_blur from MegaPov in PovRay 3.5. Interest?
Very much so, but I think I'd rather wait for the new MegaPOV to be released.
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> wait for the new MegaPOV to be released.
Will there be any new MegaPOV or will it be PoPOV? Has Nathan Kopp given
up?
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:39:50 +0200, "Hugo" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote:
> > wait for the new MegaPOV to be released.
>
> Will there be any new MegaPOV or will it be PoPOV?
Whatever it will be I hope it probably will be some day...
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3db6c1a8@news.povray.org>, "Hugo" <hua### [at] post3teledk>
wrote:
> Will there be any new MegaPOV or will it be PoPOV? Has Nathan Kopp given
> up?
Well, nobody's going to say there will never be an updated MegaPOV.
Putting the new one together and maintaining it will be a lot of work
though, and I'm sure he has other projects and a life to take care of,
remember that this is just volunteer work. In addition, there are other
possibilities that would make a MegaPOV redundant and unnecessary.
So: it might happen and it might not. Don't expect it too soon.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is it possible to make motion blur in POV-Ray withour modifying the
program's source code, or using any post processing?
Rohan _e_ii
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rohan Bernett" <rox### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:web.3dc5c73fb734bf0b2769afa0@news.povray.org...
> Is it possible to make motion blur in POV-Ray withour modifying the
> program's source code, or using any post processing?
Sure, it's possible to some extent. It's just not easily done for all scene
situations since it means overlapping multiple copies the object(s).
Here's what I tried quite a while ago, really only a test of the idea and
not good for serious renderings.
http://hometown.aol.com/xyzunknown/private/objmblur.zip
Others have done this kind of thing but I don't remember what was best,
probably plenty of messages to be found here in these newsgroups if you
search. Seems it was a hot topic about 3 or 4 years ago and then
intermittently since then.
--
Farewell,
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The IRTC entry a few years ago that simulated the pod race
from StarWars Episode I was astounding, and all done with POV.
The motion blurring was just great.
Emory
"hughes, b." wrote:
>
> "Rohan Bernett" <rox### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:web.3dc5c73fb734bf0b2769afa0@news.povray.org...
> > Is it possible to make motion blur in POV-Ray withour modifying the
> > program's source code, or using any post processing?
>
> Sure, it's possible to some extent. It's just not easily done for all scene
> situations since it means overlapping multiple copies the object(s).
> Here's what I tried quite a while ago, really only a test of the idea and
> not good for serious renderings.
> http://hometown.aol.com/xyzunknown/private/objmblur.zip
> Others have done this kind of thing but I don't remember what was best,
> probably plenty of messages to be found here in these newsgroups if you
> search. Seems it was a hot topic about 3 or 4 years ago and then
> intermittently since then.
> --
> Farewell,
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
