POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition Server Time
16 Nov 2024 03:25:19 EST (-0500)
  POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition (Message 1 to 10 of 34)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Paul Bourke
Subject: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 06:21:30
Message: <pdb_NOSPAM-B97870.21213002042004@news.povray.org>
The first POVRay Fractal Raytracing Contest is now open, see
   http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/povfrac/
If you have a favourite 3D fractal and ideas on an elegant way
to render it then maybe this contest if for you.
-- 
Paul Bourke
pdb_NOSPAMswin.edu.au


Post a reply to this message

From: Florian Brucker
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 06:42:42
Message: <406d51b2@news.povray.org>
Paul Bourke wrote:
> The first POVRay Fractal Raytracing Contest is now open, see
>    http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/povfrac/

Cool! There goes my weekend :)

10KB SDL. There really goes my weekend...

Florian


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:05:21
Message: <406d5701@news.povray.org>
Doesn't this replicate too much IRTC with a topic of "fractals"?
This is mainly because there are practically no limits on what the
user can do (except using external files, which isn't very limiting,
and a maximum of 10000 bytes, which isn't very limiting either).

  The problem I see with this is that there's really no challenge
in this competition other than making a beautiful image. Which is
exactly what IRTC is for.

  (And of course how to define a "fractal" is another question...)

-- 
plane{-x+y,-1pigment{bozo color_map{[0rgb x][1rgb x+y]}turbulence 1}}
sphere{0,2pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission 1density{spherical
density_map{[0rgb 0][.5rgb<1,.5>][1rgb 1]}turbulence.9}}}scale
<1,1,3>hollow}text{ttf"timrom""Warp".1,0translate<-1,-.1,2>}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:10:02
Message: <c4jl08$4t8$1@chho.imagico.de>
Paul Bourke wrote:
> The first POVRay Fractal Raytracing Contest is now open, see
>    http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/povfrac/
> If you have a favourite 3D fractal and ideas on an elegant way
> to render it then maybe this contest if for you.

Nice topic but the competition frequency is quite high, most people will 
not be able to invest a serious amount of time that frequently.

The links of the sample images lead to a 404 BTW.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 21 Mar. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:10:58
Message: <406d5852$1@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:406d5701@news.povray.org...
>   Doesn't this replicate too much IRTC with a topic of "fractals"?

I'm unclear as to why this is a problem/objection.

napolitana replicates margharita with a topping of 'anchovies' - I still like
both ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:14:26
Message: <406d5922@news.povray.org>
Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> >   Doesn't this replicate too much IRTC with a topic of "fractals"?

> I'm unclear as to why this is a problem/objection.

  Because there's no challenge. It's boring.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:30:02
Message: <c4jm69$524$1@chho.imagico.de>
Warp wrote:
>   Doesn't this replicate too much IRTC with a topic of "fractals"?
> This is mainly because there are practically no limits on what the
> user can do (except using external files, which isn't very limiting,
> and a maximum of 10000 bytes, which isn't very limiting either).
> 
>   The problem I see with this is that there's really no challenge
> in this competition other than making a beautiful image. Which is
> exactly what IRTC is for.

Apart from what you already mentioned i think there are the following 
important differences to the IRTC:

- the source code has to be provided
- manipulations in a paint program are not possible
- the images used for voting are guaranteed to be of comparable 
technical quality
- the competition is restricted to POV-Ray

While the last point is surely a questionable advantage the other ones 
make it quite different from the IRTC and could make it a great 
demonstration of the capabilities of POV-Ray.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 21 Mar. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: Paul Bourke
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 07:37:22
Message: <pdb_NOSPAM-EF949E.22371902042004@news.povray.org>
>   Doesn't this replicate too much IRTC with a topic of "fractals"?
> This is mainly because there are practically no limits on what the
> user can do (except using external files, which isn't very limiting,
> and a maximum of 10000 bytes, which isn't very limiting either).
>   The problem I see with this is that there's really no challenge
> in this competition other than making a beautiful image. Which is
> exactly what IRTC is for.

Granted, this is very different in terms of a challenge from SSC3.
And it is similar to IRTC, on the other hand it is a short time
contest with significant public appeal and plenty of scope for 
stimulating images.

-- 
Paul Bourke
pdb_NOSPAMswin.edu.au


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 08:42:45
Message: <406d6dd5@news.povray.org>
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> - manipulations in a paint program are not possible

  Since when this has been allowed in the IRTC?

-- 
plane{-x+y,-1pigment{bozo color_map{[0rgb x][1rgb x+y]}turbulence 1}}
sphere{0,2pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission 1density{spherical
density_map{[0rgb 0][.5rgb<1,.5>][1rgb 1]}turbulence.9}}}scale
<1,1,3>hollow}text{ttf"timrom""Warp".1,0translate<-1,-.1,2>}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: POVRay Fractal Raytracing Competition
Date: 2 Apr 2004 09:40:02
Message: <c4jtvr$7k0$1@chho.imagico.de>
Warp wrote:
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> 
>>- manipulations in a paint program are not possible
> 
> 
>   Since when this has been allowed in the IRTC?
> 

I have not said anything about this being allowed - i was just talking 
about the possibility.  In fact this rule has been interpreted quite 
loosely recently in the IRTC - all kind of convolution filters are 
considered not breaking the rules as well as resizing from a larger 
render.  If you remove artefacts or do other tweaks in a larger render 
and then scale it this is next to impossible to spot in the resulting image.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 21 Mar. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.