From: David Buck
Subject: Re: Winter is over. Where is POV-Ray 3.5?
Date: 17 Jun 2002 07:29:25
Message: <3D0DF23F.8000303@simberon.com>
> History repeats itself :-)> > http://web.archive.org/web/19961223111838/www.povray.org/cc/index.html> > ABX>
Strange that one of the reasons I released DKBTrace as the base for
POV-Ray was that I couldn't release new versions fast enough to satisfy
the users. I know what they're going through.
David Buck
Simberon Inc.
www.simberon.com
> > History repeats itself :-)> > > > http://web.archive.org/web/19961223111838/www.povray.org/cc/index.html> > > > ABX>> Strange that one of the reasons I released DKBTrace as the base for > POV-Ray was that I couldn't release new versions fast enough to satisfy > the users. I know what they're going through.
I really hopy satisfaction will reward effort.
ABX
From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Winter is over. Where is POV-Ray 3.5?
Date: 18 Jun 2002 04:36:59
Message: <3d0ef12b$1@news.povray.org>
>>> History repeats itself :-)>>>>>> http://web.archive.org/web/19961223111838/www.povray.org/cc/index.html>>>>>> ABX>>>> Strange that one of the reasons I released DKBTrace as the base for>> POV-Ray was that I couldn't release new versions fast enough to>> satisfy the users. I know what they're going through.>> I really hopy satisfaction will reward effort.
I am just wondering if 3.5 was a bad idea, might have been better to just go
for the whole rewrite (v4)
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 07/06/2002
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:32:34 +0100, "Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
> > I really hopy satisfaction will reward effort.>> I am just wondering if 3.5 was a bad idea, might have been better to just go> for the whole rewrite (v4)
I don't think so, the 'function' and 'isosurface' features are so great that
it could be wasting of time to wait for complete rewrite. Of course they were
in megapov like photons, radiosity etc. but now it is much better
implementation. There were of course other reasons explained before by Chris,
Nathan, Ron, Thorsten or somebody else.
ABX