POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : CSDL Status Server Time
19 Nov 2024 05:18:45 EST (-0500)
  CSDL Status (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Christopher James Huff
Subject: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 15:13:20
Message: <chrishuff-9EB82F.15152214042002@netplex.aussie.org>
There won't be an update this weekend. I'm reworking the object system a 
bit, the new syntax will look something like:

OBJECT_KIND OBJECT_NAME = OBJECT_PROTOTYPE.clone()|
                          OBJECT_PROTOTYPE.derive()|
                          load(FILENAME)
[{OBJECT_BLOCK}];

If OBJECT_KIND is something other than "object", only objects that are 
derived from, clones of, or delegate an object based on OBJECT_KIND are 
accepted. For example, if OBJECT_KIND is "stream", only objects that can 
be used as streams will be accepted. Since all objects are based on 
"object", using "object" will simply turn this checking off.

I've also made some changes to delegates and the "self" identifier, I'm 
still working on this.

I've also added a "reference" operator that will make an identifier 
refer to another variable. Currently the operator is ":=:". I'm debating 
whether or not to add a reference type...

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 17:25:54
Message: <3cb9f3e2$1@news.povray.org>
You mean therer won't be another beta to download tomorrow? This is not good.. I'm
going to go reset my clock now.


Post a reply to this message

From: Christopher James Huff
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 17:45:05
Message: <chrishuff-5FD8EE.17470814042002@netplex.aussie.org>
In article <3cb9f3e2$1@news.povray.org>,
 "Mahalis" <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote:

> You mean therer won't be another beta to download tomorrow? This is not 
> good.. I'm going to go reset my clock now.

Your post doesn't make any sense. I'm talking about CSDL...that's why 
the Subject line says "CSDL Status". CSDL isn't anywhere close to beta, 
and doesn't care about your clock. Were you thinking of POV-Ray 3.5?

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 17:48:56
Message: <3cb9f948$1@news.povray.org>
That's what I thought you were talking about. Sry, I'm just a bit confused.


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 18:13:01
Message: <3cb9feed$1@news.povray.org>
"Mahalis" wrote:
> You mean therer won't be another beta to download tomorrow?

It's off-topic for this thread but... Nope there won't be a beta of POV-Ray
3.5. They call it a "release candidate" instead. It's up by now.

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:  http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Mar 19)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring:  http://webring.povray.co.uk


Post a reply to this message

From: Mahalis
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 18:25:27
Message: <3cba01d7$1@news.povray.org>
Ooooohhh!! "Release candidate"!! Does this mean we may soon have the FINAL version of
3.5 so we don't have to reinstall every week?
"Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnetdk> wrote in message
news:3cb9feed$1@news.povray.org...
> "Mahalis" wrote:
> > You mean therer won't be another beta to download tomorrow?
>
> It's off-topic for this thread but... Nope there won't be a beta of POV-Ray
> 3.5. They call it a "release candidate" instead. It's up by now.
>
> Rune
> --
> 3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
> Rune's World:  http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Mar 19)
> POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
> POV-Ray Ring:  http://webring.povray.co.uk
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 14 Apr 2002 18:30:34
Message: <3cba030a@news.povray.org>
Mahalis <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote:
> Ooooohhh!! "Release candidate"!! Does this mean we may soon have the FINAL version
of 3.5 so we don't have to reinstall every week?

  Yes.
  Of course "soon" is a pretty subjective term. It could be 2 weeks, it could
be 6 months (it would still be "soon" compared to how much time has been
spent on developing 3.5).

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Hugo
Subject: Re: CSDL Status
Date: 16 Apr 2002 07:34:37
Message: <3cbc0c4d@news.povray.org>
I haven't really "discovered" CSDL either, I mean ... I know you're working
on it, Chris, and it sounds interesting with a mix between C and SDL.. If
the clever people start to use it.. But it's probably going to take some
time before I get familiar with the abilites and aims of this language.. I
don't know a cent about C.. and will it get established well enough .. only
time can tell.

Regards,
Hugo


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.