|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> ...
> I suspect one would need to use the 'pause_when_done' option, cf gnuplot's
> '-persist'. the window remains povr's, the display is "live" while povr runs.
> from Tk I'd create an empty frame with the '-container' option ...
an example (only 5 yrs ago and cannot recall details :-()
I use the attached with a BASH one-liner:
#!/bin/sh
/home/jr/src/tcltk/spiro-1.tk | gnuplot -persist
'execPlot' prepares the input to gnuplot. different for different s/wares, but
usually boils down to "feeding" program's stdin.
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'spiro-1.tk.xz.dat' (2 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/19/21 10:19 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 4/18/21 6:46 AM, jr wrote:
...
>
> I hope to be back to testing my dictionary fixes in the next few days.
>
Posted my fixes:
http://news.povray.org/povray.beta-test/thread/%3C6080263e%241%40news.povray.org%3E/
Web Message: <6080263e$1@news.povray.org>
Plus, turned up nothing more that looks wrong to me in v3.8 with
dictionaries once the fix in place.
----
Thanks jr for the testing assist!
I played quite a lot with the pure foreach array functionality too and I
turned up not a single issue (not of my own doing :-)). Your include is
looking good to me. Enough that I'll spend my few remaining play time
minutes this day thinking about better alternatives to our
Parse_String() macro hack.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:608029da$1@news.povray.org William F Pokorny wrote:
> Posted my fixes
Thanks!
ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> On 4/19/21 10:19 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> Posted my fixes: ...
> Plus, turned up nothing more that looks wrong to me in v3.8 with
> dictionaries once the fix in place.
thanks. will try patch over the coming days.
> Thanks jr for the testing assist!
the pleasure's all mine, as they say. ;-)
> I played quite a lot with the pure foreach array functionality too and I
> turned up not a single issue (not of my own doing :-)). Your include is
> looking good to me.
</dance-around-kitchen> (not quite .. crackers, there's good music on the radio
too) thanks, gives me "wind in the sails" to finish off documentation + stuff.
I also should say that it was made easier because of the "standing on the
shoulders of (POV-Ray community) titans" thing.
> Enough that I'll spend my few remaining play time
> minutes this day thinking about better alternatives to our
> Parse_String() macro hack.
what, no coffee? ;-)
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > On 4/19/21 10:19 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> > Posted my fixes: ...
> > Plus, turned up nothing more that looks wrong to me in v3.8 with
> > dictionaries once the fix in place.
>
> thanks. will try patch over the coming days.
forgot to ask (for confirmation) - same fix for 'povr' I assume?
note to LeForgeron - can/should I use WFP's fix for the 'bitter orange'?
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/22/21 4:02 AM, jr wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
...
>
> forgot to ask (for confirmation) - same fix for 'povr' I assume?
>
Yes.
To be clear; When I make public a v3.8 fix, I 'fully expect' it to apply
to the v3.8 master branch as is, but I've not verified it with my own
testing.
It's the - in hand - povr branch code I test. A branch which has other
fixes for bugs with which I do not wish to again be tangled.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |