 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In documentation there is a note "you can now specify a POV file on the
command-line without the use of the +i switch (...), the POV file then should
be the last on the commandline." and that "the default input filename is
object.pov". But seems it interfere with windows specific settings. When I
call
pvengine /RENDER /EXIT
I expect it to open object.pov, render it with default settings and exit after
rendering. But engine stays opened with error:
Initialization Error: Could not find file '/EXIT.pov'
Moreover pvengine /RENDER doesn't work with default input file either.
Any confirmation ? Similiar problems with platform specific settings on other
platforms ?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:07:49 +0200, W�odzimierz ABX Skiba <abx### [at] babilon org>
wrote:
> pvengine /RENDER /EXIT
> pvengine /RENDER
Or default file name doesn't work becouse as specified in 1.9.1 it is supposed
only "to render the file following" ?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
so try
pvengine /RENDER object.pov /EXIT
> > pvengine /RENDER /EXIT
> > pvengine /RENDER
>
> Or default file name doesn't work becouse as specified in 1.9.1 it is
supposed
> only "to render the file following" ?
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:43:55 -0500, "Andrew Wilcox" <awi### [at] unpuzzledcom>
wrote:
> so try
> pvengine /RENDER object.pov /EXIT
Do you really think I didn't ?
The problem is that it looks like some kind inconsistency in options system
but there was probably a reason. For example simplified communication
requested with one some tool.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, you are right, I think I missed the point of your post. You were
pointing out a conflict in options, not stuck on a problem.
Sorry about that,
Andrew
> > so try
> > pvengine /RENDER object.pov /EXIT
>
> Do you really think I didn't ?
>
> The problem is that it looks like some kind inconsistency in options
system
> but there was probably a reason. For example simplified communication
> requested with one some tool.
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
