 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was wondering if anyone knows how to vector the effects of Warp in a
single directtion.
For instance, if I use "warp { turbulence <0,1,0> } the warp pushes in both
+x and -x, is there anyway to push only in the +x direction?
--
#####-----#####-----#####
POV Tips and Hints at ...
http://povman.blogspot.com/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I was wondering if anyone knows how to vector the effects of Warp in a
> single directtion.
I think most of the POV team has been trying to vector Warp's efforts in
a single direction for some years, but he's far more stubborn than that.
:->
--
"It is inconsistent with the most rudimentary notions of fairness to
blindfold a man and then impose a standard which only the sighted could
hope to meet." -- Lord Bingham of Cornhill -+- http://surreal.istic.org/
www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051208/aand-1.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Hulme wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone knows how to vector the effects of Warp in a
>> single directtion.
> I think most of the POV team has been trying to vector Warp's efforts in
> a single direction for some years, but he's far more stubborn than that.
Strange, I was thinking the same thing...
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
POVMAN wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knows how to vector the effects of Warp in a
> single directtion.
>
> For instance, if I use "warp { turbulence <0,1,0> } the warp pushes
> in both +x and -x, is there anyway to push only in the +x direction?
I assume you mean -y and +y for a turbulence of <0,1,0>.
But anyway, isn't what you're asking for equivalent to using turbulence plus
translation?
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I assume you mean -y and +y for a turbulence of <0,1,0>.
>
> But anyway, isn't what you're asking for equivalent to using turbulence
> plus translation?
I see that I'm not making myself clear, and yes I meant -y +y. ( perhaps I
should re-read these before posting sometimes)
Imagine a spherical pattern, apply warp <0,1,0>. Some of the disturbed
pattern appears above the original sphere, but some also appears below the
sphere. What I would like is to push the the disturbance in only the +y
direction.
--
#####-----#####-----#####
POV Tips and Hints at ...
http://povman.blogspot.com/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
POVMAN wrote:
>> I assume you mean -y and +y for a turbulence of <0,1,0>.
>>
>> But anyway, isn't what you're asking for equivalent to using
>> turbulence plus translation?
>
> I see that I'm not making myself clear, and yes I meant -y +y. (
> perhaps I should re-read these before posting sometimes)
>
> Imagine a spherical pattern, apply warp <0,1,0>. Some of the
> disturbed pattern appears above the original sphere, but some also
> appears below the sphere. What I would like is to push the the
> disturbance in only the +y direction.
Yes. So apply warp <0,0.5,0> only and then translate by <0,0.5,0> or
whatever is needed to make sure that none of the disturbances remain
negative.
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
