 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: A-Design
Subject: Can you please help me with the following posts that i have sent to chieftalk? /// Thanks.
Date: 19 Apr 2005 18:14:36
Message: <426582cc$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.chiefarchitect.com/chieftalk/showthread.php?s=&postid=62881#post62881
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Can you please help me with the following posts that i have sent to chieftalk? /// Thanks.
Date: 19 Apr 2005 20:29:07
Message: <4265a253$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A-Design wrote:
> http://www.chiefarchitect.com/chieftalk/showthread.php?s=&postid=62881#post62881
>
>
As the response you got on Chieftalk said, the ambient settings are very
high on your textures, whether or not you are using radiosity. Ambient
settings that high are usually used for a object that is supposed to be
glowing or actually radiating light, like an LED. The high setting
might make sense for the background sky texture but not the others.
The roughness/specualr settings could also be a little intense
depending, but you need to reduce the ambient to zero and see how the
scene renders first.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: gonzo
Subject: Re: Can you please help me with the following posts that i have sent to chieftalk? /// Thanks.
Date: 19 Apr 2005 23:13:03
Message: <4265c8bf$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, as noted above, ambient settings are very high. But from your
original question it sounds like the picture was ok on the first
machine, but got brighter when you moved it to the second machine?
If so I'd question your "assumed_gamma 2.0" especially since you don't
have a display_gamma setting in your ini file. Look up display_gamma
and assumed_gamma in the docs.
RG
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: POVRAY
Subject: Re: Can you please help me with the following posts that i have sent to chieftalk? /// Thanks.
Date: 20 Apr 2005 00:49:51
Message: <4265df6f$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you all for your answers.
"gonzo" <rgo### [at] lanset com> wrote in message
news:4265c8bf$1@news.povray.org...
> Well, as noted above, ambient settings are very high. But from your
> original question it sounds like the picture was ok on the first machine,
> but got brighter when you moved it to the second machine?
>
> If so I'd question your "assumed_gamma 2.0" especially since you don't
> have a display_gamma setting in your ini file. Look up display_gamma and
> assumed_gamma in the docs.
>
> RG
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
