POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : rad_def.inc Server Time
14 Nov 2024 23:21:24 EST (-0500)
  rad_def.inc (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Bill Hails
Subject: rad_def.inc
Date: 29 Jan 2005 08:56:34
Message: <41fb9612@news.povray.org>
Hi,
I did some test renders and comparative benchmarks of the
settings in rad_def.inc. Someone may be interested:

    http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Tests/

-- 
Bill Hails
http://thyme.homelinux.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: JWV
Subject: Re: rad_def.inc
Date: 29 Jan 2005 11:50:02
Message: <41fbbeba$1@news.povray.org>
very usefull, thanks. But could you use a smaller .jpg compression next
time? The quality of some images is not very good (and its not the
radiosity, it shows especialy on the indoor HQ, on the edges of the spheres)

Greetings,

JWV

"Bill Hails" <bil### [at] europeyahoo-inccom> wrote in message
news:41fb9612@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
> I did some test renders and comparative benchmarks of the
> settings in rad_def.inc. Someone may be interested:
>
>     http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Tests/
>
> -- 
> Bill Hails
> http://thyme.homelinux.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: Maurice
Subject: Re: rad_def.inc
Date: 29 Jan 2005 12:27:00
Message: <41fbc764$1@news.povray.org>
Bill Hails wrote:
> Hi,
> I did some test renders and comparative benchmarks of the
> settings in rad_def.inc. Someone may be interested:
> 
>     http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Tests/
> 
I'm afraid your agressive JPG-compression settings kill the effect 
you're trying to show.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: rad_def.inc
Date: 29 Jan 2005 12:31:49
Message: <41fbc885@news.povray.org>
Bill Hails <bil### [at] europeyahoo-inccom> wrote:
>     http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Tests/

  You should have paid more attention on the jpeg compression parameters
you used for these images.
  These images present pathological cases for jpeg compression, which
causes very visible artifacts. It's difficult to see what are jpeg
artifacts and what are radiosity artifacts.

  Besides using less compression, you should also use 1x1,1x1,1x1 color
sampling (if your image conversion/manipulation program allows configuring
that; if not, use gimp or cjpeg).

  Of course another option is to use png instead of jpeg (remember to
run the png files through advpng and pngcrush to minimize their size).

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Hails
Subject: Re: rad_def.inc
Date: 29 Jan 2005 14:27:57
Message: <41fbe3bd@news.povray.org>
Yes, I was a bit daft using jpeg for this, I always generate
png then habitually use Imagemagick's convert to make jpegs
for publishing.

Anyway I've replaced the jpegs with the original pngs. Warp,
tx for pointing out that pngcrush utility, it's very useful.

-- 
Bill Hails
http://thyme.homelinux.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: rad_def.inc
Date: 1 Feb 2005 11:33:26
Message: <41ffaf56$1@news.povray.org>
Bill Hails wrote:
> Yes, I was a bit daft using jpeg for this, I always generate
> png then habitually use Imagemagick's convert to make jpegs
> for publishing.
> 
> Anyway I've replaced the jpegs with the original pngs. Warp,
> tx for pointing out that pngcrush utility, it's very useful.
> 
Very nice page, very helpful.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.