|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
New POV-Tree version has a lot of changes.
That's why I decided to make it available as
a beta version first.
You can get release notes, screenshots,
download page and another information here:
http://home.covad.net/~gobukhov/povtree.html
Please let me know if you will find out any
problem.
Gena.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You copy-pasted Xfrog screenshots didn't you ?? ;-)
It seems really improved.
JC
Gena wrote:
> New POV-Tree version has a lot of changes.
> That's why I decided to make it available as
> a beta version first.
>
> You can get release notes, screenshots,
> download page and another information here:
>
> http://home.covad.net/~gobukhov/povtree.html
>
> Please let me know if you will find out any
> problem.
>
> Gena.
>
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gena" <gen### [at] yahoocom> schreef in bericht
news:407a09b7$1@news.povray.org...
> Please let me know if you will find out any
> problem.
Hi Gena,
This version feels really fine and is much easier to control than the
previous version.
I got two types of warnings from POV-Ray while rendering a tree:
1) BOTTOM_COLOR_x and TOP_COLOR_x are rgbft, while in TOMTREEm.inc they are
read as rgb
2) I get a long list of identical warnings from the test pov-file concerning
"bounded CSG union split". This might refer to the bounded_by's in
TOMTREEm.inc. I am not sure.
Excellent work!!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 1) BOTTOM_COLOR_x and TOP_COLOR_x are rgbft, while in TOMTREEm.inc they are
> read as rgb
Please use TOMTREE-1.4.inc instead of TOMTREEm.inc
It supports rgbft colors and also UV mapping for leaves
which you can define in POV-Tree.
If you downloaded ZIP file you can find TOMTREE-1.4.inc
there. Or you can get it here as a separate file:
http://home.covad.net/~gobukhov/download.html
> 2) I get a long list of identical warnings from the test pov-file concerning
> "bounded CSG union split". This might refer to the bounded_by's in
> TOMTREEm.inc. I am not sure.
You are right. I think there is something wrong with
calculation of bounded_by parameter. Maybe it makes sense
to remove it at all if it won't affect performance too much.
I'll check that.
> Excellent work!!!
Thank you Thomas!
Hopefully it will be even better in the future :)
I have many ideas about new features.
Gena.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gena" <gen### [at] yahoocom> schreef in bericht
news:4080d1bc$1@news.povray.org...
> Please use TOMTREE-1.4.inc instead of TOMTREEm.inc
> It supports rgbft colors and also UV mapping for leaves
> which you can define in POV-Tree.
>
Aaah!!! Being lazy, I only downloaded the jar file. But even more stupid: I
had already TOMTREE-1.4.inc from the previous download!! I just overlooked
its presence in my folder... <bash! bash!> (head against tree trunk)
> > 2) I get a long list of identical warnings from the test pov-file
concerning
> > "bounded CSG union split". This might refer to the bounded_by's in
> > TOMTREEm.inc. I am not sure.
>
> You are right. I think there is something wrong with
> calculation of bounded_by parameter. Maybe it makes sense
> to remove it at all if it won't affect performance too much.
> I'll check that.
>
Indeed. Yes it might affect. However, I think rendering through the inc file
is good for testing, afterwards a mesh is easier to use in a scene. So,
maybe, it doesn't matter so much.
> > Excellent work!!!
>
> Thank you Thomas!
> Hopefully it will be even better in the future :)
> I have many ideas about new features.
>
Well... I am looking forward to it!!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I used an earlier version of pov-tree, just like to say thanks.:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |