 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Has anyone tried POV-Ray on these? If so, what the benchmark says?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Vadim Sytnikov" <syt### [at] ru com> wrote in message
news:3e1ef33b$1@news.povray.org...
> Has anyone tried POV-Ray on these? If so, what the benchmark says?
>
Yes, 24 seconds.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote:
> Yes, 24 seconds.
If you rendered the standard benchmark of POV-Ray 3.5 in 24 seconds (with
the suggested rendering options), I want a computer like that.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote
>
> Yes, 24 seconds.
45 minutes on P4 @ 2GHz and 24 *seconds* on P4 @ 3GHz? Are you sure? Are we
talking about the same benchmark? (I'm afraid we are not...).
I meant the benchmark runnable upon "Render -> Run Benchmark" in the Windows
POV-Ray; that is, the built-in one.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:05:08 -0500, Warp quoth:
> Shay <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote:
>> Yes, 24 seconds.
>
> If you rendered the standard benchmark of POV-Ray 3.5 in 24 seconds
> (with the suggested rendering options), I want a computer like that.
And if you're rendering Skyvase on that system in 24 seconds, something's
wrong with the computer.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
