POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000? Server Time
8 Aug 2024 10:23:45 EDT (-0400)
  OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000? (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: Tony[B]
Subject: OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000?
Date: 3 Feb 2001 12:12:34
Message: <3a7c3c02@news.povray.org>
I have been testing a free program for making JPEG2000 files from BMPs and
converting them back to BMP (to see how the compression turns out). This
program is based on the first draft of the JPEG2000 specifications... and I
must say that I am thoroughly impressed. Here are some of my results:

FORMAT    COMPRESSION    SIZE      QUALITY

(YAHI 640x480)
 BMP          -          900kb        -
 PNG          -          489kb        -
 JPG         ~0%         234kb     No perceivable quality loss
 JP2          0%         341kb     No perceivable quality loss
 JP2         10%          90kb     Some JPEGness becoming visible
 JP2         20%          45kb     Some areas become blurry and JPEGy
 JP2         30%          30kb     More blurriness and JPEGness visible
 JP2         40%          23kb     and
 JP2         50%          18kb     so
 JP2         60%          15kb     on...
 JP2         70%          13kb     ...
 JP2         80%          11kb     ...
 JP2         90%          10kb     ...
 JP2        100%           9kb     Looks like when I take my glasses off

(Abstrahere 1400x1050)
 BMP          -         4307kb        -
 PNG          -         1473kb        -
 JPG         ~0%         857kb     No perceivable quality loss
 JP2          0%        1255kb     No perceivable quality loss
 JP2         10%         430kb     No perceivable quality loss
 JP2         20%         215kb     Very slight changes in some areas
 JP2         30%         143kb     Some JPEGness in areas without much
detail
 JP2         40%         107kb     More of the above, with slight JPEGness
in areas with detail
 JP2         50%          86kb     and
 JP2         60%          72kb     so
 JP2         70%          62kb     on...
 JP2         80%          54kb     ...
 JP2         90%          48kb     ...
 JP2        100%          43kb     Lots of blurriness in some areas, others
very sharp
                                   (the more detail, the sharper it is)

I hope someone finds this useful/interesting. I know I do. I can't wait till
this gets integrated into Internet applications. :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000?
Date: 3 Feb 2001 12:17:46
Message: <slrn97of6r.2vs.ron.parker@fwi.com>
For what it's worth, off-topic is back.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000?
Date: 3 Feb 2001 16:38:52
Message: <3a7c7a6c@news.povray.org>
> For what it's worth, off-topic is back.

not for me it isn't..

where can it be (frantic searching)...


--
Rick

POV-Ray News & Resources - http://povray.co.uk
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://kitty5.com
Hi-Impact web site design & database driven e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

From: Nekar Xenos
Subject: Re: OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000?
Date: 5 Feb 2001 01:27:07
Message: <3a7e47bb@news.povray.org>
> where can it be (frantic searching)...

I can't find it either. I found the binaries newsgroups though.  Plus my FAQ
has 0 messages no matter what I set it to....


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: OT: Thoughts on JPEG2000?
Date: 5 Feb 2001 01:39:35
Message: <3A7E6063.28293193@hotmail.com>
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
> 
> > For what it's worth, off-topic is back.
> 
> not for me it isn't..
> 
> where can it be (frantic searching)...

Tell your newsreader to refresh its newsgroup listing.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.