 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I took me one year to do what I actually planned but now I did it. I took
Ron's suggestion and installed Cygwin, Mingwin and compiled gordian knots
for WIN32.
d/l under
http://www.fortunecity.de/wolkenkratzer/cute/25/gordian.html
You can create (until now) simple celtic knotwork patterns with a gui and
save them to a include file which can rendered with povray using another
include file which has been added to the package.
It works on WIN 95 and WIN 98 so far but I would like to hear if it works or
doesn't under your Win32 system.
I hope you like it, feedback is always welcome.
All the Best,
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Schimmler" <mar### [at] web de> wrote in message
news:3a64c7a7@news.povray.org...
> I took me one year to do what I actually planned but now I did it. I took
> Ron's suggestion and installed Cygwin, Mingwin and compiled gordian knots
> for WIN32.
> d/l under
> http://www.fortunecity.de/wolkenkratzer/cute/25/gordian.html
>
> You can create (until now) simple celtic knotwork patterns with a gui and
> save them to a include file which can rendered with povray using another
> include file which has been added to the package.
>
> It works on WIN 95 and WIN 98 so far but I would like to hear if it works or
> doesn't under your Win32 system.
> I hope you like it, feedback is always welcome.
>
> All the Best,
>
> Marc
>
>
I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
pan### [at] syixcom wrote:
>
> "Marc Schimmler" <mar### [at] webde> wrote in message
> news:3a64c7a7@news.povray.org...
> > I took me one year to do what I actually planned but now I did it. I took
> > Ron's suggestion and installed Cygwin, Mingwin and compiled gordian knots
> > for WIN32.
> > d/l under
> > http://www.fortunecity.de/wolkenkratzer/cute/25/gordian.html
> >
> > You can create (until now) simple celtic knotwork patterns with a gui and
> > save them to a include file which can rendered with povray using another
> > include file which has been added to the package.
> >
> > It works on WIN 95 and WIN 98 so far but I would like to hear if it works or
> > doesn't under your Win32 system.
> > I hope you like it, feedback is always welcome.
> >
> > All the Best,
> >
> > Marc
> >
> >
>
> I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
Yep. Me too. I even checked the source code and dowloaded a few images
just to verify. It seems Fortune City (or a prankster) has gone in your
page and replaced all the .jpg files with their logo but kept the file
names...
--
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
flabreque | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
@ | - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Francois Labreque wrote:
> > I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
>
> Yep. Me too. I even checked the source code and dowloaded a few images
> just to verify. It seems Fortune City (or a prankster) has gone in your
> page and replaced all the .jpg files with their logo but kept the file
> names...
Looks ok to me.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Francois Labreque wrote:
>
> > > I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
> >
> > Yep. Me too. I even checked the source code and dowloaded a few images
> > just to verify. It seems Fortune City (or a prankster) has gone in your
> > page and replaced all the .jpg files with their logo but kept the file
> > names...
>
> Looks ok to me.
I think they were talking about the splash window.
The nerve of those people. Eventually they have to lose money, don't they know
that just makes me all the less likely to look at the ad?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Ken wrote:
>
> > Francois Labreque wrote:
> >
> > > > I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
> > >
> > > Yep. Me too. I even checked the source code and dowloaded a few images
> > > just to verify. It seems Fortune City (or a prankster) has gone in your
> > > page and replaced all the .jpg files with their logo but kept the file
> > > names...
> >
> > Looks ok to me.
>
> I think they were talking about the splash window.
No. I'm talking about the main images. See below.
--
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
flabreque | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
@ | - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'web.jpg' (38 KB)
Preview of image 'web.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:19:14 -0800, pan### [at] syixcom wrote:
>I get nothing but fortunecity graphics on that page.
It's a cookie thing. If you don't take their cookie, they don't send the
right graphics. They're trying to prevent people from using their free
accounts as image servers for pages hosted on other sites, apparently.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> It's a cookie thing. If you don't take their cookie, they don't send the
> right graphics. They're trying to prevent people from using their free
> accounts as image servers for pages hosted on other sites, apparently.
>
This really sounds bad to me. Until recently I rejected all cookies. Now
using an old WIN98 box I didn't cut them off, otherwise I would have seen
it.
I start thinking a bout a cheap web provider I know ....
Thanks anyway.
Marc
> --
> Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
> My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3A659AD3.7CBA938C@videotron.ca>, Francois Labreque
<fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> No. I'm talking about the main images. See below.
Please don't post binary messages in povray.general. If you want to post
an image, post it separately in povray.binaries.images and mention it in
your main post.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> In article <3A659AD3.7CBA938C@videotron.ca>, Francois Labreque
> <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>
> > No. I'm talking about the main images. See below.
>
> Please don't post binary messages in povray.general. If you want to post
> an image, post it separately in povray.binaries.images and mention it in
> your main post.
Guilty as charged.
In fact I have complained about it in the past as well.
Sorry.
--
Francois Labreque | In the future, performance will be measured
flabreque | by the size of your pipe.
@ | - Dogbert, on networking
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
