 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
I've been rendering at 2048*1536 and found that if I stop and resume it
later (ie all day, then turn it off at night, then continue the next day) a
visible line occurs from where the render starts again. My 4 day render for
example has three visible lines, where it appers to get lighter; is there
anyway to stop this apart from leaving it rendering constantly? This could
be a fault of Moray, but to be honest I'm suspecting its just something I'm
doing wrong with POV. Thanks
Peter Cracknell (.com)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3a0d96e4@news.povray.org>, "Peter Cracknell"
<pc### [at] lineone net> wrote:
> I've been rendering at 2048*1536 and found that if I stop and resume
> it later (ie all day, then turn it off at night, then continue the
> next day) a visible line occurs from where the render starts again.
Are you using radiosity? If so, stopping the render and starting again
will often cause visible breaks. I don't think there is a way to work
around this.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> Are you using radiosity? If so, stopping the render and starting again
> will often cause visible breaks. I don't think there is a way to work
> around this.
>
Except using MegaPOV radiosity - but that would reguire some actual *shudder*
hand-editing of your POV file...
I can state for a fact that with MegaPOV it is possible to continue a radiosity
render without problems.
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
I forgot to mention I was using Radiosity, but with MegaPOV. Hand-editing
of my POV file, you must be joking, I'll have to find a way to work around
it (by the time I've finished my Moray file I barely know where I am within
Moray let alone POV, unless its hand-coded from scratch I rarely know whats
going on).
Peter Cracknell (.com)
"Margus Ramst" <mar### [at] peak edu ee> wrote in message
news:3A0DE108.22FC0BA1@peak.edu.ee...
> Chris Huff wrote:
> >
> > Are you using radiosity? If so, stopping the render and starting again
> > will often cause visible breaks. I don't think there is a way to work
> > around this.
> >
>
> Except using MegaPOV radiosity - but that would reguire some actual
*shudder*
> hand-editing of your POV file...
> I can state for a fact that with MegaPOV it is possible to continue a
radiosity
> render without problems.
>
> --
> Margus Ramst
>
> Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
> TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3a0e8bfc$1@news.povray.org>, "Peter Cracknell"
<pc### [at] lineone net> wrote:
> I forgot to mention I was using Radiosity, but with MegaPOV.
> Hand-editing of my POV file, you must be joking, I'll have to find a
> way to work around it (by the time I've finished my Moray file I
> barely know where I am within Moray let alone POV, unless its
> hand-coded from scratch I rarely know whats going on).
MegaPOV radiosity requires some different options than POV 3.1...using
the same settings won't work. There are some new parameters, so you will
probably have to edit the file by hand.
However, you don't have to code anything, there are plenty of examples
of good radiosity settings on these newsgroups, and MegaPOV radiosity
settings are much less scene-dependant than the old radiosity. Some were
recently posted in povray.binaries.images and there are probably some
good bits in the *.scene-files groups.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Peter Cracknell wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention I was using Radiosity, but with MegaPOV. Hand-editing
> of my POV file, you must be joking, I'll have to find a way to work around
> it (by the time I've finished my Moray file I barely know where I am within
> Moray let alone POV, unless its hand-coded from scratch I rarely know whats
> going on).
>
IIRC you should find the radiosity parameters in the main .pov file, i.e. the
file with the same name as your Moray scene file. The parameters need to be
somewhat different from regular POV, and two useful new options are save_file
and load_file, which will save and load your radiosity data to a file (see MP
docs for more info).
You would probably have to start (and re-start) the render directly from POV,
because otherwise I think Moray will overwrite your changes.
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Why do you stop your render at night? I have found that I get upwards of
7-8 hours of good rendertime by leaving my machine cranking while I sleep.
Not only that, but if you get up and go to work, you will typically find
that you have upwards of 15-17 hours or more worth of machine time that you
aren't on it messing with it.
Robert J Becraft
aka cas### [at] aol com
Peter Cracknell <pc### [at] lineone net> wrote in message
news:3a0d96e4@news.povray.org...
> I've been rendering at 2048*1536 and found that if I stop and resume it
> later (ie all day, then turn it off at night, then continue the next day)
a
> visible line occurs from where the render starts again. My 4 day render
for
> example has three visible lines, where it appers to get lighter; is there
> anyway to stop this apart from leaving it rendering constantly? This
could
> be a fault of Moray, but to be honest I'm suspecting its just something
I'm
> doing wrong with POV. Thanks
>
> Peter Cracknell (.com)
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it has
one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat every so
often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
A bit of insomnia doesn't help either :)
Peter Cracknell (.com)
"Robert J Becraft" <cas### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3a0eb6c8$1@news.povray.org...
> Why do you stop your render at night? I have found that I get upwards of
> 7-8 hours of good rendertime by leaving my machine cranking while I sleep.
> Not only that, but if you get up and go to work, you will typically find
> that you have upwards of 15-17 hours or more worth of machine time that
you
> aren't on it messing with it.
>
> Robert J Becraft
> aka cas### [at] aol com
>
> Peter Cracknell <pc### [at] lineone net> wrote in message
> news:3a0d96e4@news.povray.org...
> > I've been rendering at 2048*1536 and found that if I stop and resume it
> > later (ie all day, then turn it off at night, then continue the next
day)
> a
> > visible line occurs from where the render starts again. My 4 day render
> for
> > example has three visible lines, where it appers to get lighter; is
there
> > anyway to stop this apart from leaving it rendering constantly? This
> could
> > be a fault of Moray, but to be honest I'm suspecting its just something
> I'm
> > doing wrong with POV. Thanks
> >
> > Peter Cracknell (.com)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 21:03:09 -0000, Peter Cracknell wrote...
> Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it has
> one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat every so
> often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
That's pretty close to the reason that I don't leave my machine on
overnight. Without the overheating graphics card bit or the insomnia
bit.
I find it annoying to sleep with my head about five feet from a couple of
computer fans.
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jamie Davison wrote in message ...
>I find it annoying to sleep with my head about five feet from a couple of
>computer fans.
Same here, except in my case it's four feet. Additionally, if the hard disk
spins down, it sounds like a jet airplane taking off when it starts up
again.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Peter Cracknell wrote:
>
> Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it has
> one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat every so
> often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
>
Well, if I can put up with the six fans in my computer...
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Margus Ramst <mar### [at] peak edu ee> wrote in message
news:3A0DE108.22FC0BA1@peak.edu.ee...
> I can state for a fact that with MegaPOV it is possible to continue a
radiosity
> render without problems.
>
What code needs adding to allow that?
I assume save_file the first time and load_file when the render is
continued. Anything else?
I really want to render a bigger version of a scene I've got with radiosity,
but I estimate rendering time of over 50 hours
Gail
--
********************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotix co za * System.dat not found. *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Reformat hard drive Y)es O)k *
********************************************************************
* If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0 *
********************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3a0f0560@news.povray.org> , "Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineone net>
wrote:
> Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it has
> one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat every so
> often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
An iMac has no fan at all and they don't overhead either...
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
ahh, but does it run Moray?
Peter Cracknell (.com)
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:3a106c84@news.povray.org...
> In article <3a0f0560@news.povray.org> , "Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineone net>
> wrote:
>
> > Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it
has
> > one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat
every so
> > often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
>
> An iMac has no fan at all and they don't overhead either...
>
>
> Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> What code needs adding to allow that?
>
> I assume save_file the first time and load_file when the render is
> continued. Anything else?
>
Yeah, that should do the trick. The other radiosity settings (including
pretrace_start & pretrace_end) should stay the same for best results.
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> ahh, but does it run Moray?
more to the point, POV ??
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://www.kitty5.com
TEL - +44 (01625) 266358 : FAX +44 (01625) 611913
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
>
> > ahh, but does it run Moray?
>
> more to the point, POV ??
Yes, an iMac runs POV, ya schmucks.
It would run Moray if the the coders weren't too lazy or too incompetent
to write a Mac version.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3A109068.E5362B38@unforgettable.com>,
inq### [at] unforgettable com wrote:
> It would run Moray if the the coders weren't too lazy or too incompetent
> to write a Mac version.
Or if they had the time, tools, and knowledge to do so...programming
isn't always easy, and learning to program for a new platform is a lot
of work.
Anyway, we have plenty of free and shareware modellers. From what I saw
of Moray(running it in emulation under SoftWindows), there wasn't much
special about it except POV output and mostly POV-specific features. And
besides, would a Mac version of Moray be any good? Mac ports of PC
software often aren't, especially when ported by someone new to
programming Macs and who doesn't actually use Macs.
Hmm, maybe my next Cocoa project should be a simple POV modeller for OS
X...with a scripting language, of course. :-)
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> In article <3A109068.E5362B38@unforgettable.com>,
> inq### [at] unforgettable com wrote:
>
> > It would run Moray if the the coders weren't too lazy or too incompetent
> > to write a Mac version.
>
> Or if they had the time, tools, and knowledge to do so...programming
> isn't always easy, and learning to program for a new platform is a lot
> of work.
I know. I'm just mocking the poster for giving us the nth iteration of
"hmph, Macs! Do they even run any software?".
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:12:54 -0700 Xplo Eristotle wrote:
>It would run Moray if the the coders weren't too lazy or too incompetent
>to write a Mac version.
Okay, be nice now :) Lutz is neither lazy nor incompetent but if he
chooses to devote his time to a Windows-based modeller then that is his
choice to make. Lutz is also a longtime POV-Team member.
--
Alan - ako### [at] povray org - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Oh, to be semi-up to date. My 233/Rev. A iMac has a fan that sounds like an '82
escort when it really gets humming.
Cheerio,
-- Brandan
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> In article <3a0f0560@news.povray.org> , "Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineone net>
> wrote:
>
> > Er yeah but my computer is in my bedroom, and its an AMD TBird, yes it has
> > one hell of a fan and too top it off, my GFx card likes to overheat every so
> > often so I leave the lid of making it even more delightful.
>
> An iMac has no fan at all and they don't overhead either...
>
> Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Brandan Whearty wrote:
>
> Oh, to be semi-up to date. My 233/Rev. A iMac has a fan that sounds like an '82
> escort when it really gets humming.
My original g3/300 iBook has a fan that's so loud, people look to see
what that noise is, in class.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3A117E63.6D8803D2@mac.com> , Dawn McKnight <mck### [at] mac com>
wrote:
> My original g3/300 iBook has a fan that's so loud, people look to see
> what that noise is, in class.
iBooks don't have a fan! What you hear is either your CD or hard drive. If
the hard drive is very noisy, you should send it in for repair. If it is
the CD-ROM drive, remove the CD inside or place your iBook on something
non-vibrating.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trf de
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <3A10F7AD.E970DC87@diescreaming.com> , Brandan Whearty
<spa### [at] diescreaming com> wrote:
> Oh, to be semi-up to date. My 233/Rev. A iMac has a fan that sounds like an
'82
> escort when it really gets humming.
I was talking about the current iMacs, not the two year old ones.
My point merely was that buying any computer which is quiet enough to leave
on all day and night, even if it is only half the speed of the noisy ones
will ultimately be more effective: If you can leave the noisy one on 8
hours a day compared to 24 hours of the half the speed one, well, the half
the speed one will still be 50% faster when rendering complex scenes.
No reason for a major discussion ;-) Just buy a slow one ($300) for your
room and connect the two via Ethernet :-)
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Got it in one! P3-500 downstairs connected through phone cables (whopping
1mb/s) renders all-day now and AMD TBird 800 shuts up at night
Peter Cracknell
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:3a11b6f2@news.povray.org...
> In article <3A10F7AD.E970DC87@diescreaming.com> , Brandan Whearty
> <spa### [at] diescreaming com> wrote:
>
> > Oh, to be semi-up to date. My 233/Rev. A iMac has a fan that sounds
like an
> '82
> > escort when it really gets humming.
>
> I was talking about the current iMacs, not the two year old ones.
>
> My point merely was that buying any computer which is quiet enough to
leave
> on all day and night, even if it is only half the speed of the noisy ones
> will ultimately be more effective: If you can leave the noisy one on 8
> hours a day compared to 24 hours of the half the speed one, well, the half
> the speed one will still be 50% faster when rendering complex scenes.
>
> No reason for a major discussion ;-) Just buy a slow one ($300) for your
> room and connect the two via Ethernet :-)
>
>
> Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
I'm sorry but thats completely out of order, I don't wish to get into an
argument but lets say you are a Windows user, lets be realistic, because
after-all I'm not a fan of Bill Gates (far from it) but he does have a
monopoly and Windows is the largest consumer OS, if I remember correctly.
Therefore if you use Windows and a majority of people you know use Windows,
and you know how to program in Windows, and there are less Mac users,
therefore less Mac users screaming for a good modeller, which would you
choose? I wouldn't call it lazyness or incompetence, more like common
sense.
Peter Cracknell (.com)
"Xplo Eristotle" <inq### [at] unforgettable com> wrote in message
news:3A109068.E5362B38@unforgettable.com...
> "Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
> >
> > > ahh, but does it run Moray?
> >
> > more to the point, POV ??
>
> Yes, an iMac runs POV, ya schmucks.
>
> It would run Moray if the the coders weren't too lazy or too incompetent
> to write a Mac version.
>
> -Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:04:34 -0600, Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>My point merely was that buying any computer which is quiet enough to leave
>on all day and night, even if it is only half the speed of the noisy ones
>will ultimately be more effective: If you can leave the noisy one on 8
>hours a day compared to 24 hours of the half the speed one, well, the half
>the speed one will still be 50% faster when rendering complex scenes.
My solution was to build a house and put the computers at one end and my
bed at the other. Worked like a charm.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |