 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi there, where can I find a good tutorial explaining how I could
achieve to make some smoke (from a chimney far away) and some fog (or
better yet, some pollution smog fog)?
Thanks in advance!
Xilo
--
Dedicated to audio/visual and interactive artwork.
Author of The Primary Colors of CSound:
http://www.geocities.com/simonlemieux/PCCS/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xilo Musimene wrote:
>Hi there, where can I find a good tutorial explaining how I could
>achieve to make some smoke (from a chimney far away) and some fog (or
>better yet, some pollution smog fog)?
Don't know about smoke, but there are a nice page about fog
at: http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/povray/fog/
This is by Paul Bourke, and all his pages are worth
checking out (http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/).
Lots of nice stuff about graphics and math.
Have fun,
Frans.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 06:00:50 +0500, Xilo Musimene <xil### [at] hotpop com> wrote:
> some fog
There is a fog tutorial in manual.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Don't know about smoke, but there are a nice page about fog
> at: http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/povray/fog/
>
> This is by Paul Bourke, and all his pages are worth
> checking out (http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/).
> Lots of nice stuff about graphics and math.
Hmmm, isn't the fog discontinued or obsolete in POV 3.5?
If not, this is exactly what I was looking for!
Thanks,
Xilo
--
Dedicated to audio/visual and interactive artwork.
Author of The Primary Colors of CSound:
http://www.geocities.com/simonlemieux/PCCS/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> There is a fog tutorial in manual.
Silly me! I printed the reference part and left the tutorial on the
computer but finally I forgot about the tutorial part!
Thanks!
Xilo
--
Dedicated to audio/visual and interactive artwork.
Author of The Primary Colors of CSound:
http://www.geocities.com/simonlemieux/PCCS/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3EA### [at] hotpopcom>,
Xilo Musimene <xil### [at] hotpopcom> wrote:
> Hmmm, isn't the fog discontinued or obsolete in POV 3.5?
No.
You might be thinking of the fact that media is more accurate and a far
better simulation of fog than the fog feature. It is also much slower,
so when the advantages of media are less obvious, fog is still useful.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>Hmmm, isn't the fog discontinued or obsolete in POV 3.5?
>
>
> No.
>
> You might be thinking of the fact that media is more accurate and a far
> better simulation of fog than the fog feature. It is also much slower,
> so when the advantages of media are less obvious, fog is still useful.
>
Ok, I remember I think it was the halo that became obsolete...?
Anyway, Thanks a lot!
Xilo
--
Dedicated to audio/visual and interactive artwork.
Author of The Primary Colors of CSound:
http://www.geocities.com/simonlemieux/PCCS/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 05:45:03 +0500 Xilo Musimene wrote:
>Ok, I remember I think it was the halo that became obsolete...?
This is correct. Halo was an experimental feature, as are some of the
newer features in POV-Ray.
--
Alan
ako### [at] povrayorg
a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
