 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
support this platform.
Thanks for your help,
--
Ken Tyler - POV-Ray Technical Assistance Group
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Nice idea! I'm using SuSE Linux 8.1; POV-Ray 3.5 and MegaPOV 1.0.
And well, I'm using Linux for about 5 years now.
Regards,
Andreas
--
http://www.render-zone.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm using POV-Ray on Linux for, well, must be more than 5 years now.
Recently I switched to the Gentoo Linux distribution. I've already used it
on Sun Solaris as well.
- Micha
--
POV-Ray Objects Collection: http://objects.povworld.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Gentoo Linux (which sort of defies a general version number), gcc-3.2.2,
kernel 2.4.20
POV-Ray 3.50c (compiled from sources).
I'm not sure if you're asking how long I've been using Linux or POV-Ray
so I'll answer both: Linux for about 2 years, POV off and on for about
3 years.
Btw, I'm not sure how clear a picture you'll get of the Linux user
base from within this newsgroup. Mostly you'll get a picture of the
Linux user base that are currently reading these newsgroups ;)
-Roz
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> writes:
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Debian GNU/Linux unstable, kernel is v. 2.4.20. Have been using it for
about 2 years now, I think (before that Red Hat). POV-Ray version is
3.50c, compiled and packaged by Debian.
--
Ole Laursen
http://www.cs.auc.dk/~olau/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm using POV-Ray 3.5 on RedHat 7.3. I first installed linux last summer and
have been using it since then. My first POV was 1.0, I think, I got it with
a magazine and immediately fell in love with it ;)
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.3 & AIX 4.3
POV 3.5a, MegaPov 1.0 on both.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
FreeBSD and Povray 3.5. I'm on FreeBSD for about a month.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SuSE Linux 7.3 with Kernel 2.4.19 or 2.4.20, 5 years, Povray 3.5
Currently Compiling:
linuxfromscratch 4.0 with Kernel 2.4.20
> [...] This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Great! Ask if you need help with testing!
Regards,
Florian Pesth
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running.
I'm using Linux (SuSE 7.1) on own computers since 2001 and using POV on it
since the beginning. Using POV in general since version 2.2.
A lot of different versions of POV-Ray currently in use, even when using
the plain official POV i tend to do my own build rather than the official
binary.
Also occasionally running POV on other Unix machines.
> This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Great. An official RPM would probably be a good idea although a lot of
Linux distributions already include a version (SuSE seems to ship 3.5
since version 8.1).
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Feb. 2003 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken killed the keyboard with:
[snip]
Platform is A Linux From Scratch system
kernel ver.: 2.4.20-xfs, glibc 2.3.2, gcc-3.2.2
Linux: 5 years, Povray since ver. 3.1
Installed versions of povray: 3.50c and simpov 0.1
HTH
Wolfgang
--
.-. This is Linux Country.
/v\ On a quiet night, you
/( )\ can hear Windows reboot.
^^ ^^ LFS-No.: 120
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3E983F78.51A4D6FD@pacbell.net>, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet>
wrote:
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Blue Box:
Mac OS X 10.2.5
350MHz PowerPC G3
384MB RAM
gcc (GCC) 3.1 20020420 (prerelease)
I've been using Mac OS X since the Public Beta.
Black Box:
Mandrake Linux 9.0
AthlonXP 2400+
512MB RAM
gcc (GCC) 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-1mdk)
And I've been using this since about last Christmas, when I got the
machine.
On both machines, I generally use jEdit to edit the scene files, and run
POV (compiled from source) from the command line. Recently I've
installed MegaPOV 1.0 on the Mac, and will probably be using that when I
need to do something locally on that machine.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:31:52 -0700, Ken wrote:
I often compile and run the unix version on MacOSX if I'm
playing with POV at the source level.
Dave
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
POV-Ray 3.5 and MegaPOV 1.0 on Mandrake 9.0
GNU/Linux user for 2 years, POV-Ray for 3.
--
arose.hotpo.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
Distribution used : All the Mandrake distributions since 5.3. Now the
9.0 release is installed on my computer.
Kernel : 2.4.18.
I have been using the current version for less than a year.
First Linux 'acquaintance' : four years ago.
POV-RAY Versions : Own compilation of POV 3.5 and mlpov 0.82.
Computer : Athlon 1.8+ & 512 Mo
Spends 70 % time on Linux, 30 % on Windows (and decreasing)
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> writes:
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
I've been using POV-Ray 3.5 on Redhat 8.0 for about a month.
--
Duncan Dewar
dun### [at] buteorguk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Pov-Ray 3.5
on a RedHat 8.0 (more or less)
3 years
Thanks.
Ciao
Jean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Red Hat linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.18-27) and POV-Ray 3.50c.
I'm using GNU/Linux at home since 1999 (more than 4 years now),
although I used it before at work during two more years. IIRC, my first
distro was from Caldera, later tried Red Hat 6.2, and I've been
upgrading this until today.
For POV-Ray, I usually stick to official versions compiled for my own
system, but I've also used Megapov pre-1.0 in the past, while waiting
for the official 3.5.
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have been using POV-Ray in Solaris for something like 5 years
(longer than I have been in this news server).
Versions of Solaris have changed from (IIRC) 6 to 8 (the one currently
installed in my work computer).
The computers have been SparcStation 5, Sun Ultra 5, Sun Blade 100 and
Sun Blade 150.
The POV-Ray versions I have used include at least the official 3.1 and 3.5,
as well as several unofficial versions (such as lots of MegaPov versions and
pvmpov).
--
plane{-x+y,-1pigment{bozo color_map{[0rgb x][1rgb x+y]}turbulence 1}}
sphere{0,2pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission 1density{spherical
density_map{[0rgb 0][.5rgb<1,.5>][1rgb 1]}turbulence.9}}}scale
<1,1,3>hollow}text{ttf"timrom""Warp".1,0translate<-1,-.1,2>}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. ...
Mandrake 9.1, POVRay 3.5 + 3.1g with KPovModeler 1.0
I also have a habit of installing it on every system that I get access to in
the hope that it will be discovered by others and that they will be
inspired to learn how to use it.
The Johny Appleseed approach to advocacy I guess.
:o)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running.
Red Hat 7.3, POV-Ray 3.1g, using POV-Ray on and off for
about five years, still quite a newbie.
--
Steve Martin, CPBE CBNT
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3E983F78.51A4D6FD@pacbell.net...
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
FreeBSD 4.7-stable
PovRay 3.50c
5+ years
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
In order of prevalence
Linux (P4) SUSE 2.4.x
Mac OS-X 10.2.x
Itanium ia64 SUSE 2.4.x
Dec Alpha OSF (Tru64) 5.x
SGI IRIX 6.x
PovRay Versions 3.1x and 3.5x
--
Paul Bourke
pbo### [at] swineduau
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
FreeBSD 4.7 - 5+ years
PovRay 3.5 - 5+ years
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorcerer Linux (kernel 2.4.20, gcc 2.95.3)
for about a year
POV-Ray 3.5, POV-Man 0.7
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:31:52 -0700, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
Every version from DkbTrace 2.x on AIX in 1982, to POVRAY 3.5 on Linux
compiled from source.
Current versions : POV3.5, MegaPov : Mandrake 9.0 & Gentoo 1.3
Preference : Source distribution with a good .configure script
so the user can decide where the package will go and how
it is compiled, i.e. with/without graphics.
If you "have" to make a rpm version, please make sure
it installs in /usr/local
What do you mean by "support", it is for the executable only,
or also for the scripts to compute all images and animations ?
Willem
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Every version from DkbTrace 2.x on AIX in 1982, to POVRAY 3.5 on Linux
>compiled from source.
1992 of course ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Linux From Scratch 4.0
PovRay 3.5 built from source.
Used POV since 2.2
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:31:52 -0700, Ken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
I am running Slackware 8.1. I have been running Linux since 1996, when I
started with Slackware 3.0. I started with POVRay 3.1 for Linux, and am
now running POV-Ray 3.5c for Linux.
--
ICQ#66022322
http://tailkinker.contrabandent.com
It's not easy having a good time...even smiling makes my face ache.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Linux: SuSE 8.1
I'm using linux for 4,5 years now
PovRay 3.5 (own athlon optimized compilation)
Sebastian H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Home made Linux distro (followed Linux from Scratch 3.0-pre4). Linux for
more than 4 years, this distro for 3.
Have used Povray on and off for at-least 5 years. Currently using v3.5
compiled from source.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I'm using povray 3.5c on a Mandrake 9.0 with gcc 3.2 on a AMD
Athlon@900Mhz. I'm using it since march 2003 and encountered no problems
Ken a écrit:
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on
> what version of Linux/Unix,
Red Hat 8.0.
how long you have been using it
4 years
> and what version of POV-Ray you are currently running.
Pov-Ray 3.5
> This information will be used to help better support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<snip>
I've previously installed POV-Ray 3.5 on Mandrake 9.0, and on Debian
6-0r01 (?). About to reinstall Mandrake 9.1 on a P3 600mhz 512 ram and
will then use POV-Ray 3.5 (povlinux.tgz) in combination with Pyvon, will
try to install MegaPov 1.0 too.
POV user since 1999. Linux user for a couple of months.
-Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Gentoo Linux 1.4
My unix or pov?
3.5c
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Mac OS X 10.2.3
MegaPOV 1.0
Been using it for about three months.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
this quote from Ken of Sunday 13 Apr 2003 4:31 am:
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
Mandrake 9.1
Povray 3.5c
pyvon
(also going to try kmodeller now I have KDE3.1)
I've been using Linux for about 18 months, and Povray for about a year. I
don't use Povray much, just when I want a 3D image for something.
cheers
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Paul Bourke" <pbo### [at] swineduau> wrote:
> Itanium ia64 SUSE 2.4.x
> Dec Alpha OSF (Tru64) 5.x
Could you please tell how does Itanium compare to P4? Are there any
performance comparison data available (say, for SUSE running on P4 vs. SUSE
running on IA64)?..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Should have mentioned:
GCC 3.0.2
XFree86: 4.1.0
Kernel: 2.4.20
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
Mandrake 9.1
Povray 3.1
Kpovmodeler
++
--
Metal3d
http://www.metal3d.com
http://pov-wip.fr.st
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:31:52 -0700, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The TAG and The POV-Team are trying to get a better picture of how many
> people here use POV-Ray on a Linux/Unix based machine. If you do have it
> installed please respond to this message telling us on what version of
> Linux/Unix, how long you have been using it and what version of POV-Ray
> you are currently running. This information will be used to help better
> support this platform.
RedHat Linux (/etc/redhat-release reads 5.0 but it's really with latest
stuff, glibc-2.3.2 etc :) ), kernel 2.4.20aa1, used Linux since 1994.
Heavily patched Povray 3.5.
> Thanks for your help,
--
Safari - y7p### [at] sneakemailcom
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:31:52 -0700, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> Linux/Unix based machine
not exactly but...
> what version of Linux/Unix
well... DJGPP 2.03 under DOS and MinGW 2.0.0-3 in console box under Windows
since they are fastest free command line solutions for WinDOS, They are rather
environment extensions/shells than Linux/Unix but use mostly the same tools and
accepts makefiles and scripts dedicated for Unix/Linux.
> how long you have been using
do not remember... perhaps started about 4-5 years ago
> what version of POV-Ray you are currently running.
always newest possible + MegaPOV
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
currently: Mandrake 9.1 & POV-Ray 3.5.
Started with slackware, from 3.5 i think, up to 8.0, get fed up with kernel
compilation and switch to Mandrake. Using povray on linux since version 3.0,
more or less
etienne
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I never used a non-unix version.
I started with 3.0 or 3.1, can't remember exactly. That was in 2000 or 2001.
I now use 3.5 on several linux'es: an old SUSE, an old RedHat and a
recent Debian. The original 3.0 or 3.1 was included with the old SUSE, but
since then I always installed and sometimes compiled by hand. Parallel to
the official 3.5 I use a patched 3.5 on one machine (own unworthy patch).
--
merge{#local i=-11;#while(i<11)#local
i=i+.1;sphere{<i*(i*i*(.05-i*i*(4e-7*i*i+3e-4))-3)10*sin(i)30>.5}#end
pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission x}}hollow}// Mark Weyer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
currently: Slackware 8.1 or Redhat 7.3 & POV-Ray 3.5.
Gomes Luis
http://www.lightning-generator.fr.st
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for making this survey !
Installing/using:
* Always compiled/installed from source only, as non-root user.
* Starting from version 3.0 as of mid 1996, when I first got full access to
the internet :-)
POV versions currently in use:
* 3.1g and various patches (e.g. MegaPOV 0.7)
* 3.5c
Architectures:
* Linux (many kernels/distros) since 1998
* SGI (IRIX 5.x and 6.x) since 1996
* DEC/Compaq Alpha (Digital UNIX only) from 1996 to 2001
* Once I managed to compile (but not use !) POV on an old SUN and on one
Evans & Sutherland relic :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Debian 3.0r1, kernel 2.4.20, POV-Ray 3.5 (built from source), 4-5
years (since Slackware 3.0 I think)
P.S. We might want to get in touch with the Debian POV-Ray package
supporters, as a) they put it in the non-free category, and b) IIRC
they offer the documentation separately.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
slackware 9.0
kernel 2.4.20
POV-Ray 3.5 (from source)
1.5 years
David Gemelli
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I use povray 3.5 on a RedHat 7.3 for some huge rendring. It is slightly
faster than under windows
ZeSly
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:08:37 +0200, "ZeSly" <zes### [at] wanadoofr> wrote:
> I use povray 3.5 on a RedHat 7.3 for some huge rendring. It is slightly
> faster than under windows
slightly faster ? official binaries ? on the same machine ? measured with
official benchmark ?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
