 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just ran a trace with Mike Houghs POV patch (the one he used for his
flower image with the new UV mapping stuff?), and I got a disturbing error
saying that gif images will no longer be supported due to legal issues? My
regular MegaPOV 0.5 doesn't do this so I'm hoping this might just be a
mistake. Does anyone know anything about this?
--
Douglas Eichenberg
dou### [at] nls net
www.getinfo.net/douge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39bd84bd@news.povray.org>, "Doug Eichenberg"
<dou### [at] nlsnet> wrote:
> I just ran a trace with Mike Houghs POV patch (the one he used for
> his flower image with the new UV mapping stuff?), and I got a
> disturbing error saying that gif images will no longer be supported
> due to legal issues?
> My regular MegaPOV 0.5 doesn't do this so I'm hoping this might just
> be a mistake. Does anyone know anything about this?
details. Are you sure your copy of MegaPOV 0.5 doesn't do this?
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Since when removing support for a non-licenced patented format is a mistake?
Legally speaking keeping the support would be the mistake.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
>details. Are you sure your copy of MegaPOV 0.5 doesn't do this?
I better double check, but I seriously think it may have worked with a
GIF. My last IRTC entry (siren) used a GIF image for a heightfield
and rendered fine, but when I imported the same code into Mike's
patch it generated the error. I'll check again tonight when I get
home from work.
Doug Eichenberg
dou### [at] nlsnet
www.getinfo.net/douge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12 Sep 2000 05:12:15 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Since when removing support for a non-licenced patented format is a mistake?
> Legally speaking keeping the support would be the mistake.
Actually, I didn't know anything about the whole GIF licensing
thing... I thought the patched version was buggy or something! Oh
well, goodbye GIF. It only allowed a 256 color palette anyway, so who
needs it.
Doug Eichenberg
dou### [at] nlsnet
www.getinfo.net/douge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
