In article <39B42E4E.1345ED64@nigels.com>, nig### [at] nigelscom wrote:

> 	Isn't is shame that it's not based on something
> 	standardised, such as XML? :-)

Nope.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

In povray.general Nigel Stewart <nig### [at] nigelscom> wrote:
: 	Isn't is shame that it's not based on something
: 	standardised, such as XML? :-)

  XML may be easy for a parser to read, but if a newbie (or a oldbie for that
matter) sees povray code in XML he will not understand a word.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message