 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <38A2CE02.5145A6B7@ida.utb.hb.se>, sa9### [at] ida utb hb se
wrote:
> Overloading functions (macros) is currently not possible. Maybe
> something to implement in 3.5?
This sounds more like default values for parameters than
overloading--although overloading might also be nice, I don't think it
would be possible without changing the syntax for variables(which might
not be such a bad idea).
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoo com
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> "Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povray org> wrote :
> >
> > so you're safe from ridicule:
> >
>
> Well, at least about this....
Bill DimWitt. (couldn't resist) :-)
--
___ ______________________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come" -Beatles
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:53:20 -0600, David Fontaine wrote:
>Bill DeWitt wrote:
>> Well, at least about this....
>
>Bill DimWitt. (couldn't resist) :-)
I've managed to resist all these years. Surely you could have. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote :
>
> Bill DimWitt. (couldn't resist) :-)
>
This is one of the most common ones. Here is the list of ones that have
caused their owners to sprout broken noses so far....
DimWitt (3)
DipShit (2)
DeTwitt (1)
DickLick (1)(which my spellchecker thinks should be picklock)
DeWittless (1)
I once let a "BeShat" slide on account of originality and because he got
the past tense of "to shit" correct.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 18:30:21 -0500, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
> I once let a "BeShat" slide on account of originality and because he got
>the past tense of "to shit" correct.
Ahem, that past tense is a myth last that I cared to check. It follows
the conjugation of "sit" because they are somewhat related, but it
could as well have preferred the "fit" way. It's a made-up thing
afaik.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usa net
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Peter Popov wrote:
> Ahem, that past tense is a myth last that I cared to check. It follows
> the conjugation of "sit" because they are somewhat related, but it
> could as well have preferred the "fit" way. It's a made-up thing
> afaik.
Since it derives from Old English, and most of the similar verbs derived
from Old English ("sit" and "spit") are strong verbs, it's entirely
logical that it follow the same pattern. I don't have an OED, and none
of my Old English textbooks have the word, but I don't have the Old
English leechcraft book (the one place I'd expect it), so I'm not
entirely surprised I can't find it. If I really, really wanted to, I
might be able to look it up at the friendly neighborhood reference
library.
-Mark Gordon
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <chrishuff_99-A1E76B.16322010022000@news.povray.org> , Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> This sounds more like default values for parameters than
> overloading--although overloading might also be nice, I don't think it
> would be possible without changing the syntax for variables(which might
> not be such a bad idea).
You may want to reconsider after reading:
<http://www.AskTog.com/columns/028WebStealers.html>
As a programmer I don't agree with him, but as a user I surely have to :-)
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trf de
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> DimWitt (3)
> DipShit (2)
> DeTwitt (1)
> DickLick (1)(which my spellchecker thinks should be picklock)
> DeWittless (1)
It's all in good humor...well, maybe not...
--
___ ______________________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come" -Beatles
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
per <http://www.m-w.com/dictionary.htm>
Main Entry: shat
past and past participle of SHIT
"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usa net> wrote in message
news:AFCjOLiE2pcJByPRUFOIBbzQ8y=7@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 18:30:21 -0500, "Bill DeWitt"
> <the### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
>
> > I once let a "BeShat" slide on account of originality and because he
got
> >the past tense of "to shit" correct.
>
> Ahem, that past tense is a myth last that I cared to check. It follows
> the conjugation of "sit" because they are somewhat related, but it
> could as well have preferred the "fit" way. It's a made-up thing
> afaik.
>
>
> Peter Popov
> pet### [at] usa net
> ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>gadget(knobs)
>gadget(knobs,lights,dials)
>gadget(dials,dial_light,dial_needle,dial_range)
>
I had a similar problem writing my wall macro.
What I did was to have as macro parameters only those
fields necessarry. At the beginning of the file with the macro in,
I declare variables for the optional stuff to a default. The
user can then redeclare the variables before calling the macro.
eg
// file macro.inc
#declare Var1=0;
#macro ThisandThat(Vara,Varb,varc)
....
// Use var1 somewhere here
....
#end
Works fine for me, also solves the problem of not being able to
remember which parameter comes first.
Gail
*******************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotix co za * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
*******************************************************************
* Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
*******************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |