|
 |
On 13/9/2024 15:25, jr wrote:
> hi,
>
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Oh now you're not guilty of anything, know nothing about it and of
>> course your lack of reading comprehension is my lack of spellchecking,
>> not yours at all whatsoever... not playing the fool at all neither
>
> </shrug> a German might say "Wie man in den Wald ruft, so schallt es heraus".
>
>
>> Oh yeah, I had to ask twice for you to come with the answer to an
>> ambiguous 2 letter word. BTW Regarding is like this "Re:" your lack of
>> letter composition is... lacking, you Snowflake
>
> fair comment. fwiw, I do aim to be consistent in my deviation from the norm.
>
>
>>> says the person of words. wanting "someone in charge", not prepared to even do
>>> some work for themselves _and_ the community. </sigh>
>>
>> ... So you want me to make some work while being practically a stranger to this
community? what else you're being la
> zy but control remoting people about? Snowflake?
>
> try "rational". _if_ you had some kind of group set up on ${service}, and got
> "usage", then you could come here and ask, with some justification, whether that
> group wouldn't be better "housed" in "official" POV-Ray, or linked to, etc.
> but, so far, words, ideas only. well, as the saying goes, "words are cheap".
>
>
> regards, jr.
>
A Bolivian would say: no estoy proyectando sobre tí, pobre imbecil
Yeah, you're abnormal and moronic, yet you think you're rational; not
contradiction at all.
Yeah, I'm not going to work for you for free, Fritz; but you seem to
know a lot, then why don't you do it? hypocrite Communist
Post a reply to this message
|
|
