[GDS|Entropy] wrote:
> So whats next? :-)
If I may...
What problem are we trying to address that the TC-RTC does not? You can
certainly argue that the TC-RTC is a step backwards from the IRTC in
some ways--but I don't see anyone arguing that. People are just
pretending that the TC-RTC doesn't exist.
Is the problem that the TC-RTC has a name that starts with TC instead of I?
--
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmail com -- wtr### [at] calpoly edu
There are no problems which cannot be solved by judicious use of high
explosives.
-- British commando, circa WWII
Post a reply to this message
|