Am 23.09.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>>> Also, I guess it might be useful to add another visual cue between the>>>> type 3 description and the subsequent description of common features.>>>>>> wasn't /feeling/ any of the several things i tried so i left it as is>>>> Mind if I mess with it? Then you can blame it on me if you're still not>> totally happy with it ;)> > go for it...i haven't given up either
Done. Feel free to throw it overboard again if inspiration strikes you.
On 9/23/18 8:37 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 23.09.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Jim Holsenback:> >>>>> Also, I guess it might be useful to add another visual cue between the>>>>> type 3 description and the subsequent description of common features.>>>>>>>> wasn't /feeling/ any of the several things i tried so i left it as is>>>>>> Mind if I mess with it? Then you can blame it on me if you're still not>>> totally happy with it ;)>>>> go for it...i haven't given up either> > Done. Feel free to throw it overboard again if inspiration strikes you.>
well i could have done that but i does look better...like i said i was
being lazy and trying to avoid touching the two upstream section map
files that wikidocgen uses to do the section renumbering. adding
sub-sections is not a free move
Am 23.09.2018 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> On 9/23/18 8:37 AM, clipka wrote:>> Am 23.09.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Jim Holsenback:>>>>>>>> Also, I guess it might be useful to add another visual cue between>>>>>> the>>>>>> type 3 description and the subsequent description of common features.>>>>>>>>>> wasn't /feeling/ any of the several things i tried so i left it as is>>>>>>>> Mind if I mess with it? Then you can blame it on me if you're still not>>>> totally happy with it ;)>>>>>> go for it...i haven't given up either>>>> Done. Feel free to throw it overboard again if inspiration strikes you.>>> > well i could have done that but i does look better...like i said i was> being lazy and trying to avoid touching the two upstream section map> files that wikidocgen uses to do the section renumbering. adding> sub-sections is not a free move
Sorry about that.
Any way to help you with that? Or add some automation to it?
On 9/23/18 8:53 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 23.09.2018 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Holsenback:>> On 9/23/18 8:37 AM, clipka wrote:>>> Am 23.09.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Jim Holsenback:>>>>>>>>>> Also, I guess it might be useful to add another visual cue between>>>>>>> the>>>>>>> type 3 description and the subsequent description of common features.>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't /feeling/ any of the several things i tried so i left it as is>>>>>>>>>> Mind if I mess with it? Then you can blame it on me if you're still not>>>>> totally happy with it ;)>>>>>>>> go for it...i haven't given up either>>>>>> Done. Feel free to throw it overboard again if inspiration strikes you.>>>>>>> well i could have done that but i does look better...like i said i was>> being lazy and trying to avoid touching the two upstream section map>> files that wikidocgen uses to do the section renumbering. adding>> sub-sections is not a free move> > Sorry about that.> Any way to help you with that? Or add some automation to it?>
no worries...found my script. i had to fire up an old 32bit box
