 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm using 3.6.1.
The index entries for most of the transform keywords point only to the
quickref. They should point to better locations with actual text
descriptions. Separate links to the quickref are OK, as long as they are
nested underneath the main links in the index.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/14/2009 11:09 PM, SharkD wrote:
> I'm using 3.6.1.
>
> The index entries for most of the transform keywords point only to the
> quickref. They should point to better locations with actual text
> descriptions. Separate links to the quickref are OK, as long as they are
> nested underneath the main links in the index.
>
> Mike
Also, the index entries for "transform", "transformations" and
"transformations > quickref" all lead to the quickref entry.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SharkD" <mik### [at] gmail com> wrote in message
news:4aff7f0c$1@news.povray.org...
> I'm using 3.6.1.
>
> The index entries for most of the transform keywords point only to the
> quickref. They should point to better locations with actual text
> descriptions. Separate links to the quickref are OK, as long as they are
> nested underneath the main links in the index.
Thanks for all your hard work, however your post is a bit lacking ....
I'm back writing the code to pull this stuff back out of the wiki and I
don't have time to go digging. If you would create a talk page (not the
entire page ... just the section(s)) were you've spotted the above mentioned
that would be immensely helpful.
Jim
BTW: Your post about "Operators" was equally confusing .... if you wouldn't
mind following up in kind, I'd appreciate it!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SharkD" <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:4aff7f0c$1@news.povray.org...
> I'm using 3.6.1.
>
> The index entries for most of the transform keywords point only to the
> quickref. They should point to better locations with actual text
> descriptions. Separate links to the quickref are OK, as long as they are
> nested underneath the main links in the index.
>
> Mike
redirected the rotate, scale and translate links in this section:
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_2#Identifiers_and_Keywords
zat what yer talkin' bout?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/15/2009 7:04 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> redirected the rotate, scale and translate links in this section:
>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_2#Identifiers_and_Keywords
>
> zat what yer talkin' bout?
>
> Jim
That's certainly an improvement. However, it would be better still if
the index pointed to the actual page where the keyword is described.
For instance, "translate" should point here:
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Tutorial_Section_2.2#Translate
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SharkD" <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:4b005ede$1@news.povray.org...
> On 11/15/2009 7:04 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> redirected the rotate, scale and translate links in this section:
>>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_2#Identifiers_and_Keywords
>>
>> zat what yer talkin' bout?
>>
>> Jim
>
> That's certainly an improvement. However, it would be better still if the
> index pointed to the actual page where the keyword is described.
>
> For instance, "translate" should point here:
>
> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Tutorial_Section_2.2#Translate
>
> Mike
yes ... that's what i did with the change mentioned above.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/16/2009 6:58 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> yes ... that's what i did with the change mentioned above.
My original post was with regard to the index of the Windows HTML Help
file, not any links in individual help pages.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SharkD" <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:4b01db1d$1@news.povray.org...
> On 11/16/2009 6:58 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> yes ... that's what i did with the change mentioned above.
>
> My original post was with regard to the index of the Windows HTML Help
> file, not any links in individual help pages.
>
> Mike
ok ... so it appears that we've corrected the root of that problem.
coincidently ... been working on the document map section of povdocgen, so
I'll double check to make sure this section has been mapped properly.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
