On 2/8/2018 6:51 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>> That,s for +am2.
>> I think that it mean that if the anti-aliasing threshold is not
> Maybe so. If that's the case, then I think a different phrase needs to be used,
> rather than "no anti-aliasing". Otherwise, the sentence looks kind of like: 'use
> anti-aliasing while not using anti-aliasing' (!)
Post a reply to this message