On 11/21/2016 3:36 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 1:37 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 21.11.2016 um 18:19 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>> On 11/21/2016 10:16 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
>>>> I don't think this is the primary reason to use emission. I think that
>>>> emission is supposed to be used for glowing objects. The wording makes
>>>> it seem like it is just a hack to retain old behavior from POV 3.6.
>>>> This
>>>> is what threw the developer off in the thread I linked to.
>>>
>>> to quote myself from an earlier post in different NG ... mo betta?
>>>
>>> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Emission
>>
>> Actually, no -- sorry ;)
>
> it's been fixed bwana ... along with several run-on sentences and bad
> grammar etc ... looked at the entire page
>

That is better but may be too terse.

Mike

Post a reply to this message