On 11/21/2016 1:37 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 21.11.2016 um 18:19 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>> On 11/21/2016 10:16 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
>>> I don't think this is the primary reason to use emission. I think that
>>> emission is supposed to be used for glowing objects. The wording makes
>>> it seem like it is just a hack to retain old behavior from POV 3.6. This
>>> is what threw the developer off in the thread I linked to.
>>
>> to quote myself from an earlier post in different NG ... mo betta?
>>
>> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Emission
>
> Actually, no -- sorry ;)

it's been fixed bwana ... along with several run-on sentences and bad 
grammar etc ... looked at the entire page

Post a reply to this message