|
 |
On 2023-05-23 07:08 (-4), Bald Eagle wrote:
> OK - I see it now.
>
> I was thinking in terms of the macro CALL, not the macro "constructor".
>
> So yeah, what you're saying now makes a lot more sense.
Yes, of course the *caller* should be able to reuse the name as often as
desired, no warnings necessary.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |