 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Having POV up and running again may not be a good thing for my overall
> productivity, but thanks to all the suggestions I've gone back and made some
> adjustments. I'm much happier with the rock texture this time around, and the
> trees are more appropriately sized. A little bit different perspective, too.
>
Now you nailed it... great work!
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Really lovely, both versions. The second version is definitely better, but it's
a really subtle improvement - the rocks are just that bit rockier, and the
vegetation more sharply delineated by the rock.
You can just feel the lazy heat! Now, where's my hammock and rum...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 08.01.2014 04:14, Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Once again, it seems the first one was a bit too large.
Stunning! Now it would be very intriguing to have a "pedestrian view"
render from the beach of the main island... or a view downwards from its
rocky mountain top! Or even from inside the forest...
More suggestions: adding a crude level-of-detail system, containing
things such as pebbles, shells or driftwood for close-ups of the beach,
marine life in the water. Or what about rendering a topographic map of
the islands?
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Now playing: Tangent (Tangerine Dream) - live December 1983 in Warsaw,
Poland
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/01/2014 23:32, Kirk Andrews wrote:
>
> Nice scene! I really like the texture on those cliffs!
>
Thank you. A lot of what I do is learnt from JVP.
> The trees are from PovTree. I'd never heard of Arbaro - looks like I might need
> to check it out.
>
The link is here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/arbaro/
I find it easier to work with.
John (working on the Kat's machine)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonart com> wrote:
> Once again, it seems the first one was a bit too large.
The island and atmosphere are so realistic that the ship stands out like a sore
thumb. It is the wrong model as the sails look as if they are in a fresh gale.
Furl them thar sails. Me harty. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote:
> "Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonartcom> wrote:
> > Once again, it seems the first one was a bit too large.
>
> The island and atmosphere are so realistic that the ship stands out like a sore
> thumb. It is the wrong model as the sails look as if they are in a fresh gale.
> Furl them thar sails. Me harty. ;-)
Hmmm...that is a good point. It's a shame, though, since the ship is the one
thing in the image that has motion to it; it feels like it's going somewhere.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/01/2014 6:54 PM, Kirk Andrews wrote:
> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote:
>> "Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonartcom> wrote:
>>> Once again, it seems the first one was a bit too large.
>>
>> The island and atmosphere are so realistic that the ship stands out like a sore
>> thumb. It is the wrong model as the sails look as if they are in a fresh gale.
>> Furl them thar sails. Me harty. ;-)
>
> Hmmm...that is a good point. It's a shame, though, since the ship is the one
> thing in the image that has motion to it; it feels like it's going somewhere.
>
If you could reposition the ship out of the lee of the island and make
her heel over some more. It might make it more believable. Or just
remove the sails and have her hove to.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
