 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A colour anaglyph viewable with red/cyan 3d glasses.
In pursuit of Frederick Stanley's punch bowl (also know as The Stanley Cup), a
penalty shot may be awarded at the discretion of the referee, following certain
guidelines.
Comments welcome.
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'lord_stanley_of_preston.png' (612 KB)
Preview of image 'lord_stanley_of_preston.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice modelling, really...
I don't have those 3d-glasses handy at the moment, but I spontaneously thought:
shouldn't the red and blue images be closer together the farther the object is
from the camera? Here it seems to be the other way round!
Maybe I'm still too tired, had a bad night :(
Happy raytracing
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Karl Anders wrote:
> I don't have those 3d-glasses handy at the moment, but I spontaneously thought:
> shouldn't the red and blue images be closer together the farther the object is
> from the camera? Here it seems to be the other way round!
Count the poles ;) There is a repetetive structure which
may cause you to match the wrong cyan-red pairs so they seem
to be close together in the foreground.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: "Jérôme M. Berger"
Subject: Re: Anaglyph (red/cyan), Penalty shot
Date: 1 Jun 2010 15:45:56
Message: <4c056374@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Karl Anders wrote:
>
>> I don't have those 3d-glasses handy at the moment, but I spontaneously
>> thought:
>> shouldn't the red and blue images be closer together the farther the
>> object is
>> from the camera? Here it seems to be the other way round!
>
> Count the poles ;) There is a repetetive structure which
> may cause you to match the wrong cyan-red pairs so they seem
> to be close together in the foreground.
Don't bother with the poles. Look at the players. The one in front
has almost perfectly matched cyan-red images while the goal has very
separated images!
Jerome
--
mailto:jeb### [at] free fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> Nice modelling, really...
>
> I don't have those 3d-glasses handy at the moment, but I spontaneously thought:
> shouldn't the red and blue images be closer together the farther the object is
> from the camera? Here it seems to be the other way round!
>
> Maybe I'm still too tired, had a bad night :(
>
> Happy raytracing
> Karl
>
>
The focus is on the player in the center of the ice. So, it's normal
that the bottom of the image does have whidely separated images.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Karl Anders" <kar### [at] webde> wrote:
.....
> shouldn't the red and blue images be closer together the farther the object is
> from the camera? Here it seems to be the other way round!
.....
> Karl
No :-)
The farther apart the red/cyan images the farther 'into' or 'out of' the image
plane.
In the following, using the same images (cropped), the closer manikin should
appear 'in front of' the computer monitor.
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'hockey_rink_c.png' (205 KB)
Preview of image 'hockey_rink_c.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
