|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Paean wrote:
> And also, I upload two images from the two new data files and the previous pov
> file expect the samples modified to 20. With the higher resolution data file,
> the results seems better, while not good enough.
A higher resolution df3 should help, but for tuning the media
rendering right placing it in a simple water box should be fine and
much less overhead on rendering (and bandwidth) than using a mesh.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Paean" <Pae### [at] gmail com> wrote:
A new result.
Only absorbing media is used.
interior {
ior 1.33
media {
absorption 1
// emission rgb<0, 0, 1.1>
intervals 1
samples 200
// samples 50
// samples 5
density
{ density_file df3 densFileName interpolate 2 scale <1, 2, 1>
translate < -0.5, -1.5, -0.5>
density_map
{ [ 0 rgb <1, 1, 0>*0]
[ 0.01 rgb< 1, 1, 0>*0]
[0.01 rgb <1, 1, 0>*1]
[0.05 rgb <1, 1, 0>*6]
[0.4 rgb <1, 1, 0>*20]
[0.5 rgb <1, 1, 0>*40]
[0.6 rgb <1, 1, 0>*50]
[ 1 rgb <1, 1, 1>*90]
}
}
}
}
Any suggestions or help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Paean
}
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'drops136.png' (168 KB)
Preview of image 'drops136.png'
![drops136.png](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.4adad3f5edf569a01524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/drops136.png?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |