 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Wow!
>
> Is this using focal blur to smudge the horizon?
Thanks! No, just ground fog.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Thanks everyone. Here's a larger render:
Very believable. The sales need a bit more texture, I think, but the wood is
spot-on.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:16:51 -0500, Kirk Andrews <kir### [at] tektonart com>
wrote:
>Christian Froeschlin wrote:
>> Wow!
>>
>> Is this using focal blur to smudge the horizon?
>
>Thanks! No, just ground fog.
Sea fog? :-)
I was thinking that if you could make a redder sky it would look quite
Turneresque.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> web.4aca706fd99cc1e51322341f0@news.povray.org...
>> So I made a ship. It took me a while--this is certainly my most ambitious
>> Wings3D project I've ever attempted. In fact, I had never really
>> attempted any
>> UV mapping in Wings before, but it turned out to be easier than I thought.
>>
>> There's still plenty of details I'd like to add, but over all, I'm very
>> happy
>> with my efforts so far. Now all I need is that patch that the brilliant
>> minds
>> around here were developing to support translucency for those sails!
>>
>> Larger render coming soon.
>>
>>
> I really love it !
> She is rather plump :)
> Is that the Sargasso sea ? The water is very brownish
>
> Marc
>
>
Most ships from that era where rather plump. In that time, increasing
cargo space and logability was more importent than speed.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I really love it !
>> She is rather plump :)
>> Is that the Sargasso sea ? The water is very brownish
>>
>> Marc
>>
>>
> Most ships from that era where rather plump. In that time, increasing
> cargo space and logability was more importent than speed.
>
>
> Alain
Yes, in fact, in my curiosity I ended up doing quite a bit of research.
The model itself is based on diagrams I found of a sixteenth-century
caravel, probably not so different from the original Mayflower.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's really nice. The stylised look is amazing, I have no idea how you did
that.
It looks like a painting, without any corny fake brush strokes.
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonartcom> wrote in message
news:web.4aca706fd99cc1e51322341f0@news.povray.org...
> So I made a ship. It took me a while--this is certainly my most ambitious
> Wings3D project I've ever attempted. In fact, I had never really
> attempted any
> UV mapping in Wings before, but it turned out to be easier than I thought.
>
> There's still plenty of details I'd like to add, but over all, I'm very
> happy
> with my efforts so far. Now all I need is that patch that the brilliant
> minds
> around here were developing to support translucency for those sails!
>
> Larger render coming soon.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek schrieb:
> That's really nice. The stylised look is amazing, I have no idea how you did
> that.
>
> It looks like a painting, without any corny fake brush strokes.
Absolutely.
You know, Kirk, I'm really in for photorealism as the ultimate goal of
raytracing, but this shot of yours really weakens my argumentation.
I absolutely, positively *love* it!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4acb742f$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>>
> Most ships from that era where rather plump. In that time, increasing
> cargo space and logability was more importent than speed.
>
>
> Alain
Yes but I was referring not only to hte hull but to the sails as well :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Tek schrieb:
>> That's really nice. The stylised look is amazing, I have no idea how
>> you did that.
>>
>> It looks like a painting, without any corny fake brush strokes.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> You know, Kirk, I'm really in for photorealism as the ultimate goal of
> raytracing, but this shot of yours really weakens my argumentation.
>
> I absolutely, positively *love* it!
Thanks, indeed! Glad you like it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
> That's really nice. The stylised look is amazing, I have no idea how you did
> that.
>
> It looks like a painting, without any corny fake brush strokes.
>
Thanks! I guess that's always my goal.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
