 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Impressive. Looks like a photograph. You are a master in these kind of
things.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey... stop posting photos here!
;-)
Paolo
>Robert McGregor on date 08/04/2009 22:43 wrote:
> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineart com> wrote:
>> Here's the seaweed height_field scattered about randomly a few hundred times
>> across the (no_image) water surface. This should look pretty good when
>> submerged and refracted :)
>
> Here's a quick test of the lagoon with my height_field seaweed floating in the
> water. I tried using media in the water, but with all the water normals, sky
> reflections, and floating stuff it's not really visible anyway, so I've decided
> against it for this image...
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Robert McGregor nous illumina en ce 2009-04-08 16:43 -->
> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
>> Here's the seaweed height_field scattered about randomly a few hundred times
>> across the (no_image) water surface. This should look pretty good when
>> submerged and refracted :)
>
> Here's a quick test of the lagoon with my height_field seaweed floating in the
> water. I tried using media in the water, but with all the water normals, sky
> reflections, and floating stuff it's not really visible anyway, so I've decided
> against it for this image...
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Are you sure that's only "a quick test"???
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> Are you sure that's only "a quick test"???
Well, I suppose the real issue is that the code only took a few minutes to write
overall so this was quick in that regard. It's the rendering that's the
bottleneck. I ran several tests over a few hours, that one took an hour or so,
I consider that pretty quick when tweaking things with full refraction &
reflection, heh.
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> Impressive. Looks like a photograph. You are a master in these kind of
> things.
>
> Thomas
Thank you, Thomas :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
