 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> > paradox. In my parallel probability universe (from which I am mailing you),
>
> If we get all your parallel personae to bang randomly on their keyboards and
> email the result to this forum, would one of them produce a reflective
> sphere on a checkered plane?
>
> ;-)
I think that if a reflective sphere on a chequered plane did not exist then
we would have to invent it. A bit like the continuous creation theory,
really.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.471dc58e1319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>
> Have you looked?
>
Well... he is not in the phone book.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.471dd2771319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>> > dragon
>> > paradox. In my parallel probability universe (from which I am mailing
>> > you),
>>
>> If we get all your parallel personae to bang randomly on their keyboards
>> and
>> email the result to this forum, would one of them produce a reflective
>> sphere on a checkered plane?
>>
>> ;-)
>
> I think that if a reflective sphere on a chequered plane did not exist
> then
> we would have to invent it. A bit like the continuous creation theory,
> really.
>
We are offended by checkers, and we loath reflections...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
> news:web.471dc58e1319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> >
> > Have you looked?
> >
> Well... he is not in the phone book.
>
> Thomas
superposition of states. Would he?
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> >
>
> We are offended by checkers, and we loath reflections...
>
> Thomas
But draughts are not chequers!
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.471e0a831319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>
>
>> >
>>
>> We are offended by checkers, and we loath reflections...
>>
>> Thomas
>
> But draughts are not chequers!
>
You see? That is where our universes diverge!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.471e0a131319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:web.471dc58e1319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>> >
>> > Have you looked?
>> >
>> Well... he is not in the phone book.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> He wouldn't be in the phone book with dragons looking to see if he were in
> a
> superposition of states. Would he?
>
Aah... you do not know our phone books... you would be surprised!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot napsal(a):
> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
> news:web.471e0a131319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>>> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
>>> news:web.471dc58e1319a9adc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>>>> Have you looked?
>>>>
>>> Well... he is not in the phone book.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>> He wouldn't be in the phone book with dragons looking to see if he were in
>> a
>> superposition of states. Would he?
>>
>
> Aah... you do not know our phone books... you would be surprised!
>
> Thomas
>
>
yould you mind tranferring yout thread into the p.o-t, please ;-) ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jan Dvorak" <jan### [at] centrumcz> schreef in bericht
news:471f0fee$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>
> yould you mind tranferring yout thread into the p.o-t, please ;-) ?
Oh dear! We are wandering away from serious business. You are right.
Sorry.... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Jan Dvorak" <jan### [at] centrumcz> schreef in bericht
> news:471f0fee$1@news.povray.org...
> >>
> >
> > yould you mind tranferring yout thread into the p.o-t, please ;-) ?
>
> Oh dear! We are wandering away from serious business. You are right.
> Sorry.... :-)
>
> Thomas
Yes, me too. Sorry.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
