POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Mmmm...breadboard... Server Time
2 Aug 2024 12:18:28 EDT (-0400)
  Mmmm...breadboard... (Message 7 to 16 of 16)  
<<< Previous 6 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: JS
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 29 Sep 2007 18:55:00
Message: <web.46fed6ea260418cd48c683060@news.povray.org>
Thanks for your comments but:
*My components that I have bought new DO have shiny leads.
*I found it easier to use rectangle bending.
*You must have a different battery to the one I used to make the model.

James S.


Post a reply to this message

From: JS
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 29 Sep 2007 19:00:00
Message: <web.46fed7cd260418cd48c683060@news.povray.org>
Thanks, indeed the LED's need work, however, I did use a skysphere. The
circuit is a 555 standard astable or LED flasher. Pin 4 is reset which is
connected to +4.5V so it doesn't reset. The reason there are so many links
is beacuse of the limitation of bending the wires.

James S.


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 29 Sep 2007 21:12:21
Message: <46fef7f5$1@news.povray.org>
JS nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/09/29 18:51:
> Thanks for your comments but:
> *My components that I have bought new DO have shiny leads.
> *I found it easier to use rectangle bending.
> *You must have a different battery to the one I used to make the model.
> 
> James S.
> 
> 
The one "B" battery I ever saw was several years ago, and it was an old dead 
one, maybe they changed the model since. I can't find any now, and for the last 
40 years, in my area.

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Caught Asleep At Your Work Desk

Just in case your boss catches you asleep at your desk, be ready to blurt out 
this excuse #1:  I was working smarter - not harder.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jellby
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 30 Sep 2007 04:40:22
Message: <ch24t4-6ha.ln1@badulaque.unex.es>
Among other things, Alain saw fit to write:

> JS nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/09/29 18:51:
>> *You must have a different battery to the one I used to make the model.
>> 
> The one "B" battery I ever saw was several years ago, and it was an old
> dead one, maybe they changed the model since. I can't find any now, and
> for the last 40 years, in my area.

I don't know the English or standard name, but I think what James tried to
model was this type of battery:
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?C=SEO&U=SiteMapByDept&ModuleNo=31494
which, I agree, has round ends in the blades (and a sweet-metallic taste if
you touch it with your tongue).

-- 
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby


Post a reply to this message

From: Simon
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 30 Sep 2007 16:49:11
Message: <47000bc7$1@news.povray.org>
This brings back memories :)

The number of times I had to wire up 555 timers for various circuits - it 
must tbe the best known chip in the world :)

Thanks for a stroll down memory lane!

I think I'm going to ahve to go and model an Op-Amp circuit now. Maybe a 
DtoA converter with an ammeter to show the output and LEDs on the inputs... 
The possibilities :D

Thanks for the ideas!

"JS" <bos### [at] yahoocouk> wrote in message 
news:web.46fc3228b72f4cd2b6429ee0@news.povray.org...
> As one who builds electronic circuits I've tried to create a virtual 
> version
> of the famous 555 astable LED flasher. I had problems with the breadboard
> creating the holes; using a loop took too long and without wasn't much
> faster. So, I created the holes of one row in a block just once and then
> used that again and again to build the breadboard.
>
> Any comments please!
>
> James S.
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Post a reply to this message

From: JS
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 30 Sep 2007 18:40:00
Message: <web.47002540260418cdabca0c760@news.povray.org>
Yeah, that's close. The one I have is made by Philips and is of the type
3R12 (4.5V). Strangely, the longest lead is neagative and the shortest is
positive, breaking with tradition used with most other components.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 1 Oct 2007 04:20:00
Message: <web.4700ad4b260418cdc4e49fa40@news.povray.org>
"Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> This brings back memories :)
>
> The number of times I had to wire up 555 timers for various circuits - it
> must tbe the best known chip in the world :)
>
> Thanks for a stroll down memory lane!
>
> I think I'm going to ahve to go and model an Op-Amp circuit now. Maybe a
> DtoA converter with an ammeter to show the output and LEDs on the inputs...
> The possibilities :D
>
> Thanks for the ideas!
>

I hope that you are not going to go for the easy option and use a 741. How
about using a 709? I know that you would need more external components but
that is where the fun lies :)

Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: dlm
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 2 Oct 2007 09:17:32
Message: <470244ec$1@news.povray.org>
"JS" <bos### [at] yahoocouk> wrote in message 
news:web.46fc4425260418cdb6429ee0@news.povray.org...
> Sorry, no picture, I'll try again...
>
Lots of fun things you can do with a 555 (or 556)
See 
http://www.kingcharlesschool.co.uk/admin/files/Public/Departments/5/Downloads/555TIMER.pdf

Some years ago I built a 555-based metronome.
The biggest problem was making a properly calibrated dial for a rotary pot.


DLM


Post a reply to this message

From: Bryan Valencia
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 2 Oct 2007 13:16:56
Message: <47027d08@news.povray.org>
Whoa, cool asynchronous multivibrator!

My project boards all have tapered square holes though.

---
Bryan Valencia

- I'd rather live with false hope than with false despair.


Post a reply to this message

From: Simon
Subject: Re: Mmmm...breadboard...
Date: 17 Oct 2007 16:00:01
Message: <471669c1@news.povray.org>
> I hope that you are not going to go for the easy option and use a 741. How
> about using a 709? I know that you would need more external components but
> that is where the fun lies :)
>
> Stephen
>

Sorry for the delay in replying - work got in the way of fun. I was 
originally thinking of a 741 but you're right a 709 would be more 
challenging.

I'll post it when done (Give me ~ 6 months :D)


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 6 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.