![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Well, I have now two totally different scenes started. This is one of them.
Still an empty stage, but I find it strangely attractive in its stark
nudity.
Built in Moray and rendered with radiosity of course.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Empty Stage.jpg' (67 KB)
Preview of image 'Empty Stage.jpg'
![Empty Stage.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C46d7e165%40news.povray.org%3E/Empty%20Stage.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
> Well, I have now two totally different scenes started. This is one of them.
> Still an empty stage, but I find it strangely attractive in its stark
> nudity.
> Built in Moray and rendered with radiosity of course.
>
> Thomas
Yes, the image looks finished already :-)
You will have to work hard to fill it and do it justice.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.46d7f2d366d469d3c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>
> Yes, the image looks finished already :-)
> You will have to work hard to fill it and do it justice.
>
Yes, and I shall keep this image anyway as it is now.
This is (imo) a better version. I had forgotten to bring back the assumed
gamma in Moray to its standard value...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Empty Stage.jpg' (58 KB)
Preview of image 'Empty Stage.jpg'
![Empty Stage.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C46d7fbcb%40news.povray.org%3E/Empty%20Stage.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
> news:web.46d7f2d366d469d3c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> >
> > Yes, the image looks finished already :-)
> > You will have to work hard to fill it and do it justice.
> >
>
> Yes, and I shall keep this image anyway as it is now.
> This is (imo) a better version. I had forgotten to bring back the assumed
> gamma in Moray to its standard value...
>
> Thomas
It is a better image of the room but I prefer the first, it looks less
clinical and empty.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.46d8017966d469d3c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>
> It is a better image of the room but I prefer the first, it looks less
> clinical and empty.
>
That is true. I shall keep both options open.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |